PDA

View Full Version : H2O found on the moon.



iizahsum
October 22nd, 2010, 09:30 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_sci_shoot_the_moon

Apparently they found water vapor and ice on the moon.

Rentafence
October 22nd, 2010, 09:39 PM
Water you talking about?

Bodzilla
October 22nd, 2010, 10:33 PM
Water you talking about?
http://www.modacity.net/forums/images/customavatars/avatar1339_17.gif

who honestly didnt know they'd be water on the moon.

DEElekgolo
October 22nd, 2010, 10:50 PM
Ok
















Now what

ThePlague
October 22nd, 2010, 10:56 PM
Moonbase?

Bodzilla
October 22nd, 2010, 11:00 PM
Ok

Now what

now we rape and pillage another pristine enviroment!

ChemicalFizz
October 22nd, 2010, 11:04 PM
Dihydrogen Monoxide!

Rentafence
October 22nd, 2010, 11:24 PM
http://www.modacity.net/forums/images/customavatars/avatar1339_17.gif

who honestly didnt know they'd be water on the moon.

I'm having trouble parsing this.

Dwood
October 23rd, 2010, 02:56 AM
now we rape and pillage another pristine enviroment!

Too bad there's no life there so it honestly doesn't matter?

t3h m00kz
October 23rd, 2010, 03:18 AM
It's theorized the moon is comprised of a chunk of the earth.

I'm not surprised.

paladin
October 23rd, 2010, 04:18 AM
It's theorized the moon is comprised of a chunk of the earth.

I'm not surprised.

. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_impact_hypothesis)

Warsaw
October 23rd, 2010, 10:05 AM
Considering how hydrogen and, consequently, water are two of the most prevalent substances in the universe, I'm not at all surprised.

Bodzilla
October 23rd, 2010, 06:20 PM
Considering how hydrogen and, consequently, water are two of the most prevalent substances in the universe, I'm not at all surprised.
!

Necr0matic
October 25th, 2010, 11:38 PM
They figured that out years ago, then came back and said it again as if it was new.
Not even kidding, they announced the information publically in 19somethin'.

n00b1n8R
October 26th, 2010, 12:03 AM
Considering how hydrogen and, consequently, water are two of the most prevalent substances in the universe, I'm not at all surprised.
Hydrogen being common does not mean water is common.
Unless you've got a reference to back that statement up?

Bodzilla
October 26th, 2010, 01:59 AM
^

oxygen is no where near as abundant as hydrogen but it is more common then other elements.

And Necr0 the reason why this is a big deal is because water has been commonally accepted in scientific communities to exist on the moon, the evidence suggested it. we just didnt have much in the way of hard imperical data so alot of creationists Opposed it because it means theres a chance for life in other planets.

it's the whole "durr durr where special and god loves us and US ALONE THERE IS NOTHING OUTSIDE WE ARE THE ONLY IMPORTANT THINGS IN GODS EYES."

You can still find a ton of video's using this faulty logic to try and persuade people over to their warped frame of mind.

sleepy1212
October 26th, 2010, 07:50 AM
"durr durr where special and god loves us and US ALONE THERE IS NOTHING OUTSIDE WE ARE THE ONLY IMPORTANT THINGS IN GODS EYES."

which is funny because it's usually the same kind of people pointing at the sky and saying " ah seen it, them bright lights went right over the barn"

Warsaw
October 26th, 2010, 06:54 PM
Hydrogen being common does not mean water is common.
Unless you've got a reference to back that statement up?

I did read it in some science magazine, but that was a long time ago and I have a stack about five feet tall of said magazines (Scientific American). Water is common, it's finding the appropriate combination of atmosphere, temperature range, and water that is difficult and hence why Earth-like planets are diamonds amongst coal (though to be fair, coal is pretty damn valuable).

TeeKup
October 27th, 2010, 04:05 AM
I did read it in some science magazine, but that was a long time ago and I have a stack about five feet tall of said magazines (Scientific American). Water is common, it's finding the appropriate combination of atmosphere, temperature range, and water that is difficult and hence why Earth-like planets are diamonds amongst coal (though to be fair, coal is pretty damn valuable).

A lump of coal can also become a beautiful diamond.

In other words...should our species reach an inter-stellar traveling stage, and we cannot find a suitable "diamond" because of either size or other factors...we should make one of those lumps of "coal" into one.

My god what obvious and cheesy word play. :-3

...SCIENCE!!

Warsaw
October 27th, 2010, 08:53 PM
And even if we don't do that, those lumps of coal can provide valuable resources for other things.

Heathen
October 28th, 2010, 02:29 AM
http://www.modacity.net/forums/images/customavatars/avatar1339_17.gif

who honestly didnt know they'd be water on the moon.

Who would be water on the moon? I honestly don't know...

Rentafence
October 28th, 2010, 12:46 PM
Who would be water on the moon? I honestly don't know...

SYNTAX ERROR: WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

king_nothing_
October 28th, 2010, 02:16 PM
Who would be water on the moon? I honestly don't know...
I would.


:mysterysolved: