PDA

View Full Version : RIP Sean Connery you used to be cool and they named my bro after you then this shit


n00b1n8R
August 24th, 2011, 07:55 AM
N41DOloKzSk

This is actually real.
Bodzilla
August 24th, 2011, 08:09 AM
that looks so bad that i want to shoot myself.
n00b1n8R
August 24th, 2011, 08:26 AM
It looks like the CGI from brood war :v:
Or Theme Hospital!
Patrickssj6
August 24th, 2011, 08:46 AM
Or Theme Hospital!
THIS xD
king_nothing_
August 24th, 2011, 11:58 AM
Is this the software (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_Movie_Maker) they used for that?


http://www.file-extensions.org/imgs/app-picture/1343/3d-movie-maker.png
Limited
August 24th, 2011, 01:51 PM
I think I skipped a heart beat when I read the topic title.

The visuals wouldnt look so bad if it had decent lighting, that said its utter shit.
Kornman00
August 24th, 2011, 01:55 PM
Surely this isn't for real :ehhh:
Limited
August 24th, 2011, 02:05 PM
Worst part? He voice acted a pilot of this, well a "short" back in 2006.
Warsaw
August 24th, 2011, 03:34 PM
Typical British low production value television. All of the UK programs I have ever watched always started off looking like utter shit until they got popular and improved. Even Doctor Who in 2005 looked like crap.
n00b1n8R
August 24th, 2011, 05:49 PM
Typical British low production value television. All of the UK programs I have ever watched always started off looking like utter shit until they got popular and improved. Even Doctor Who in 2005 looked like crap.
Dr Who CGI was fine for 2005 direct to TV. Find me any other show using CGI at that time that looked any better (you can't)
TeeKup
August 24th, 2011, 05:50 PM
Looks like Wallace and Gromit.
Kornman00
August 25th, 2011, 12:27 AM
Looks like Wallace and Gromit.
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash2/41787_214277156210_9019_n.jpg
Donut
August 25th, 2011, 01:37 AM
i second the heart skipping a beat on the title. iv been dreading the day that real RIP thread pops up. connery is my favorite famous person. hes also the only one i can name, but thats besides the point :U
=sw=warlord
August 25th, 2011, 05:14 AM
Dr Who CGI was fine for 2005 direct to TV. Find me any other show using CGI at that time that looked any better (you can't)
stargate Atlantis.
[made by MGM so what do you expect?]
n00b1n8R
August 25th, 2011, 05:19 AM
stargate Atlantis.
[made by MGM so what do you expect?]
The early Atlantis CGI wasn't that great but fair enough.
Warsaw
August 25th, 2011, 01:21 PM
Dr Who CGI was fine for 2005 direct to TV. Find me any other show using CGI at that time that looked any better (you can't)

Battlestar Galactica. Firefly did better even earlier. Do I win? Just about any Canadian/American big-name show using CGI had/still has better CGI than Doctor Who.

Don't get me wrong, though. Doctor Who is still my favourite show to watch.
=sw=warlord
August 25th, 2011, 01:30 PM
On second thought, which Era are we talking off?
Doctor who has been around since 1963 so if this is some kind of circle jerk on who did what first, Doctor who is definitely in there for one of the first, albeit not in terms of CGI.
[Rememberance of the Daleks will always be the best Dalek episode second only to Genesis of the Daleks..]
Warsaw
August 25th, 2011, 11:21 PM
It's about quality of special effects (and cameras/lighting) in TV shows. I was just saying that this thing looks to me like typical British TV: it has a low production value and the special effects reflect that. Doctor Who has had terrible CG throughout most of its life, even for its time; good storytelling is what has kept it alive. Compared to shows like Battlestar Galactica and Firefly, the new series of Doctor Who (2005-present) had mediocre CG on its start-up as well.

It's not about who did what first, it's just about who does it better. I watch BBC quite a bit, and most of the programs look come off as chintzy; I watch them for their content, though, not their visuals. It's like playing an old or casual (read: tetris) game: I play it because it's fun, not because it's pretty.