I actually really like Smack's idea.
I wonder, if this were any other judge would they have done a background check to make sure they weren't some conservative mother fucker who wears WWJD underwear? If this judge can't vote on it due to "impartial" circumstances, then no judge who attends any kind of church, and/or disapproves of gay marriage, and/or a myriad other personal configurations should be allowed to rule on this.
I'm so sick of hearing about religious pussies getting all tight assed over same sex couples wanting to get married. Guess who else hates gays, America? Iran. You don't want to be like Iran do you, America? No? I didn't think so. Now bend over and take it like a man. No one died and made you king on what defines marriage. Words and symbols have different meanings to different peoples with different cultures. Stop being ignorant and learn to love and accept thy neighbor.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)