PDA

View Full Version : Battle.net "Real ID" shows users first and last name on forums and ingame



CodeBrain
July 6th, 2010, 09:35 PM
http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=25626109041&sid=3000


Battle.net Update: Upcoming Changes to the Forums

Recently, we introduced our new Real ID feature - http://www.battle.net/realid/ , a new way to stay connected with your friends on the new Battle.net. Today, we wanted to give you a heads up about our plans for Real ID on our official forums, discuss the design philosophy behind the changes we’re making, and give you a first look at some of the new features we’re adding to the forums to help improve the quality of conversations and make the forums an even more enjoyable place for players to visit.

The first and most significant change is that in the near future, anyone posting or replying to a post on official Blizzard forums will be doing so using their Real ID -- that is, their real-life first and last name -- with the option to also display the name of their primary in-game character alongside it. These changes will go into effect on all StarCraft II forums with the launch of the new community site prior to the July 27 release of the game, with the World of Warcraft site and forums following suit near the launch of Cataclysm. The classic Battle.net forums, including those for Diablo II and Warcraft III, will be moving to a new legacy forum section with the release of the StarCraft II community site and at that time will also transition to using Real ID for posting.

The official forums have always been a great place to discuss the latest info on our games, offer ideas and suggestions, and share experiences with other players -- however, the forums have also earned a reputation as a place where flame wars, trolling, and other unpleasantness run wild. Removing the veil of anonymity typical to online dialogue will contribute to a more positive forum environment, promote constructive conversations, and connect the Blizzard community in ways they haven’t been connected before. With this change, you’ll see blue posters (i.e. Blizzard employees) posting by their real first and last names on our forums as well.

We also plan to add a number of other features designed to make reading the forums more enjoyable and to empower players with tools to improve the quality of forum discussions. Players will have the ability to rate up or rate down posts so that great topics and replies stand out from the not-so-great; low-rated posts will appear dimmer to show that the community feels that they don’t contribute effectively to the conversation, and Blizzard’s community team will be able to quickly and easily locate highly rated posts to participate in or to highlight discussions that players find worthwhile.

In addition, individual topics will be threaded by context, meaning replies to specific posts will be grouped together, making it easier for players to keep track of multiple conversations within a thread. We’re also adding a way for Blizzard posters to “broadcast” important messages forums-wide , to help communicate breaking news to the community in a clear and timely fashion. Beyond that, we’re improving our forum search function to make locating interesting topics easier and help lower the number of redundant threads, and we have more planned as well.

With the launch of the new Battle.net, it’s important to us to create a new and different kind of online gaming environment -- one that’s highly social, and which provides an ideal place for gamers to form long-lasting, meaningful relationships. All of our design decisions surrounding Real ID -- including these forum changes -- have been made with this goal in mind.

We’ve given a great deal of consideration to the design of Real ID as a company, as gamers, and as enthusiastic users of the various online-gaming, communication, and social-networking services that have become available in recent years. As these services have become more and more popular, gamers have become part of an increasingly connected and intimate global community – friendships are much more easily forged across long distances, and at conventions like PAX or our own BlizzCon, we’ve seen first-hand how gamers who may have never actually met in person have formed meaningful real-life relationships across borders and oceans. As the way gamers interact with one another continues to evolve, our goal is to ensure Battle.net is equipped to handle the ever-changing social-gaming experience for years to come.

For more info on Real ID, check out our Real ID page and FAQ located at http://www.battle.net/realid/ . We look forward to answering your questions about these upcoming forum changes in the thread below.

Update - Text updated to include more current and correct information regarding legacy forums and their use of Real ID. "The classic Battle.net forums, including those for Diablo II and Warcraft III, will be moving to a new legacy forum section with the release of the StarCraft II community site and at that time will also transition to using Real ID for posting."

This is the end.

343guiltymc
July 6th, 2010, 09:40 PM
This is an optional feature? Can't they all just make a "fake" real ID name?

Yoko
July 6th, 2010, 09:40 PM
So then I'll use my porn star name Mike Honcho so no one knows my real name

I mean really all you have to do is alias to get around this it can't be that hard


This is an optional feature? Can't they all just make a "fake" real ID name?
Also no, this is mandatory

Inferno
July 6th, 2010, 09:44 PM
Hi! My name is Letha Whapons.

rossmum
July 6th, 2010, 09:50 PM
this is dumb on two counts

one, the very principle of it

two, how easy it is to circumvent

Amit
July 6th, 2010, 10:32 PM
Why would people want to allow their real names to be used? The whole point of the Internet Identity is to come up with something creative that you can use anonymously. I use my real first name here, but I sure as hell wouldn't add my last name to it.

Kyle
July 6th, 2010, 11:05 PM
Expect to see face stabbings sky rocket after this is implemented.

Limited
July 7th, 2010, 09:22 AM
Surely this breaks the Data Protection Act 2000.



The purpose of the new act is to protect the individual rights and freedoms of persons especially their right to privacy with respect to the processing of personal data.

The act applies to personal data (information that applies to a living person) whether it is held on a computer system or a piece of paper and there are particularly stringent rules surrounding certain sensitive data. These include matters relating to health, sexual life, religious beliefs, political opinions, racial background, trade union membership and criminal offences. Information about a company is not covered by this law.

This is why when you book a ticket on a train, and they put that 'ticket stub' in the seat to identify it is taken and not to be used by any one else, they cannot put the persons name on it.

I'd be suing battle.net if I was a member.

Sel
July 7th, 2010, 09:28 AM
I stopped caring about battle net and sc2 after the no intercontinental friendships thing prevented me and my euro boyfriend from playing together!

This is still another stupid decision though.

Amit
July 7th, 2010, 03:39 PM
Smells like Activision bullshit to me.

NullZero
July 7th, 2010, 05:08 PM
See the BBC News article on this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10543100.stm

Although I hate WoW, SC2 is a big potential and if I want to play it, I'd have to reveal my name for what purpose exactly? There is a reason why people use alias'.

Such a dumb f'ing move just to change the mood of the forums. I already have facebook, I don't want another one thanks!

Cortexian
July 7th, 2010, 07:06 PM
Surely this breaks the Data Protection Act 2000.



[/I]This is why when you book a ticket on a train, and they put that 'ticket stub' in the seat to identify it is taken and not to be used by any one else, they cannot put the persons name on it.

I'd be suing battle.net if I was a member.
Irrelevant. By signing up you're agreeing to Activision and Blizzards TOS and such, which probably has something about this included in it which allows them to use your personal information this way.

Kyle
July 7th, 2010, 07:20 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l1_8wefR7c

Horrible aspect ratio, but this is going to be the outcome of Real ID, minus the hilariousness. Fucking clownshoes.

Limited
July 7th, 2010, 09:06 PM
One World of Warcraft player, Jim Brand, contacted BBC News to say how disappointed he was over the change. "I have been using the forums for over five years, reporting bugs and trying to be helpful. Now, to have the privilege to help people on the forums I have to reveal my real name; I'm dead against it," he said.
Irony of the day.

:D Great film Kyle

Kyle
July 9th, 2010, 03:18 PM
Real ID will not be implemented (http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=25968987278&sid=1) (but possibly will be in a different form sometime in the future).

SiriusTexra
July 9th, 2010, 03:58 PM
^ Bullshit. They'll want everyone to invest their time and money into the game (SC2). Few months down the track, THEN they will implement it. They've built it, they've made it. It's not going away.

Honestly, with region lock, no lan, and this shit, it's plain obvious Blizzard have been given a big finger up the ass, to use a VERY anticipated game, to usher in some new tasty treats for us all to accept as "how it is now".

Blizzard don't care about fucking piracy. Broke european devs don't worry about piracy. Saying the one company, who has been the most rewarded in terms of praise and funds (a whole fucking COUNTRY is dedicated to your game) with the widest reach in the market of any game ever, is worried about piracy and sales, is fucking hilarious.

They don't give a single fuck about piracy, or "forum friendliness" for that matter, they're just trying to see where the line can be drawn, what is too far, and what were willing to put up with.

No doubt Activions role, but Activision answer to Vivendi, and Vivendi answer to General Electric. Honestly, it was little surprise to me that such an anticipated game wouldn't bring some lovely new treats with it.


But you know what, if MW2 taught us anything, it'll work. People will put up with perpetual shit in order to play their shitty game, it's pretty astonishing. The fact that people continue to buy Ubi games is again, astonishing.


Actually, typing this, remembering Bungies "World Domination Plan" and their merger with Activision is making me chuckle. I think it's fair to say the next bungie title will be jam packed full of goodies.

Saggy
July 9th, 2010, 11:20 PM
So, Blizzard realized this was a bad idea and decided to retract their implementation of using real names on their forums. Trolls, rejoice!

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/64684

Cortexian
July 10th, 2010, 12:21 AM
So, Blizzard realized this was a bad idea and decided to retract their implementation of using real names on their forums. Trolls, rejoice!

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/64684

We know.


Real ID will not be implemented (http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=25968987278&sid=1) (but possibly will be in a different form sometime in the future).

Saggy
July 10th, 2010, 12:30 AM
Hmm... guess I need to learn how to read then. Goddammit.

Kyle
July 10th, 2010, 03:26 PM
Bullshit. They'll want everyone to invest their time and money into the game (SC2). Few months down the track, THEN they will implement it. They've built it, they've made it. It's not going away.

Oh I don't doubt it. They're pretty much telling people what they want to hear to keep the dogs at bay. There are many bad things for PC gaming (lack of dedicated servers, DRMs, etc.) but displaying a person's actual name is just plain stupid.

p0lar_bear
July 11th, 2010, 04:16 PM
I still don't get why Blizzard doesn't simply allow pseudonyms on the WoW forums like anywhere else. I'd prefer to post as p0lar_bear, not with my real name (yes I know this was reversed) or as one of my characters.

Bodzilla
July 12th, 2010, 02:15 AM
what the fuck is the reasoning behind region lock, like what the fuck is that shit

i hear theres also no chat channels....


:wtc:

Dwood
July 12th, 2010, 02:25 AM
How is this better than current Battle.net?

Saggy
July 12th, 2010, 11:08 PM
So, in an ironic turn of events...

...The ESRB releases the e-mail addresses of all those who complained about "Real ID". (http://www.joystiq.com/2010/07/12/esrb-accidentally-releases-email-addresses-of-real-id-complainan/)

Cortexian
July 13th, 2010, 01:48 AM
Epic fail or amazing troll?

p0lar_bear
July 13th, 2010, 03:20 AM
Wowwwwwwwwwwwww.

I'm going to have to go with amazing troll on this one.