Printable View
If MW3 is following the trend of how CoD normally is, then it's laughable.
But I'm willing to bet that this one, like I said before, is going to change things up a LOT because of the two assisting developers and a fresh set of employees in IW itself.
I will laugh so hard if their "most advanced multiplayer ever" is A.) a copy of all of Reach's features pasted into the core MW gameplay, or B.) Battlefield-esque gameplay.
Or some godawful mishmash of both played on cramped, poorly designed maps with ridiculously unbalanced weapons.Quote:
Originally Posted by Warsaw
Oh, wait...
No, MW2's (and Black Ops's) features pale next to Reach's. They haven't gotten away from core CoD 4+ multiplayer, they've just made it worse.
I do agree about the maps and crap weapons, though.
It was more about CoD taking features from other games than trying to say their features are equal to Reach specifically.Quote:
Originally Posted by Warsaw
How can you say there features are equal to Reach when Reach basically had taken similar gameplay elements from the CoD series? And even then, Reach still plays pretty deferentially.
Quote:
Originally Posted by higuy
Are people THAT dumb?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooky
Seriously??
Yeah fuck which ever game dev is making the game. Derailing a subway train in London and explosions, really?? What inconsiderate fucking prick thought of that plot?? That is literally like making a mission where you crash a plane into a skyscraper in New York. The COD series has no fucking tact or care apart from their own piles of cash.
MW2's airport mission...Quote:
Originally Posted by Limited
Yeah that was bad, but it didn't directly relate to a real life event, this does.
If the game had the plane thing I described people would be up in arms.