Re: Halo: Anniversary - The Halo 1 remake (fuck anyone who calls it "halo ce" remake)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Donut
^game companies do usually strive to make more than one game...
10 years from now:
Halo: Combat Evolved: Anniversary: Anniversary Evolved.
or HCEAAE. But really HA20.
But seriously, you fucking crit a game post-release so developers can get a sense of 'well, that was a dumb idea, we should probably never do that again! in fact, wtf were we even thinking?'. Fucking bulbous crewmen. The Navy can't become THAT soft in 500 years :|.
Well shit, I take that back. After all, games have become this shitty after only 10 years http://www.kornnersoftware.com/trillian/drunk.gif
Re: Halo: Anniversary - The Halo 1 remake (fuck anyone who calls it "halo ce" remake)
What the fuck are you talking about!? You are the second person now who has taken what I said the wrong way :\ Did I ever say not to criticize the game? No, I didn't, I was specifically bothered that people here wasted 3 pages of stupid arguments over the size of a characters mustache in a video game.
Re: Halo: Anniversary - The Halo 1 remake (fuck anyone who calls it "halo ce" remake)
WRONG.
MARINE.
MODELS.
E: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdTYv...el_video_title It seems like the proper models ARE there, but not in the campaign clips of the PoA?
Re: Halo: Anniversary - The Halo 1 remake (fuck anyone who calls it "halo ce" remake)
Re: Halo: Anniversary - The Halo 1 remake (fuck anyone who calls it "halo ce" remake)
Funny, I don't recall quoting or referencing a Bobblehob post (or even mustaches for that matter) in my post
*re-checks*
Yep, wasn't replying to you. However, since you want it to be about your gripe about peopling griping about mustache: the "HD" version of the game should have just been a true touch up, literally what the game would look like if it had been made with today's technology. Evolution. Not transformers where a truck can turn into some walking & derping killing machine. 1 + 1 = 2. It does not equal three. Or four. Or three. The minute they started to not do this, the community was well within their right to make 9000+ pages of WHAT THE FLYING FUCK DID YOU DO TO X posts.
This place has a couple handfuls of members, so if the majority of them are tweaking out about some detail, chances are they are all going to post about it. Then you have the anti-tweakers (eg, you) who then post about them tweaking out, only furthering the massive tweak fest that is unfolding. Hence the couple of pages that were mostly about the silly mustache Johnson is sporting in HA10.
If you're going to do something, do it fucking right, and stay true to the original along the way. Facial details, stomach sizes, derp-faces, etc shouldn't needed to be mucked with. They wanted to re-use H3/Reach assets? Fine, whatever, but they should have stuck to a standard. Gonna use MF'ing Reach trooper (ie, army) models for HA10 marines (!= army)? Then use H3's Johnson as well. Don't go reinventing the wheel, with different materials, in the HD "remake" of a game.
I cannot begin to fathom why they didn't just use the Reach Keyes model either, as that was pretty "10 years later" shit already.
Bungie: sometimes ignored non-game fiction, but was actually iterative on the original designs as they moved forward.
343i: keeps in mind fiction from the books, but seems to have some point to prove that they're at the helm now and are not Bungie, so we have all these changes. Changes to equipment and mood may make sense for H4, with humans having researched Forerunner tech and new settings, but this Halo1 dammit. Halo1 characters.
But hey, at least we can just play the game in 2001 mode, amiright marines modacity? Mmmhmmm, damn right I am.
Hopefully the manual/credits will shed some more light on the remake artists, so we can see who we really need to grind our axes with at the end of the day.
Re: Halo: Anniversary - The Halo 1 remake (fuck anyone who calls it "halo ce" remake)
Porntstar Johnson. hehehehehe
Re: Halo: Anniversary - The Halo 1 remake (fuck anyone who calls it "halo ce" remake)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lightning
The marines had to shed a few layers to land on a beach.
Re: Halo: Anniversary - The Halo 1 remake (fuck anyone who calls it "halo ce" remake)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
annihilation
Porntstar Johnson. hehehehehe
Johnson knows what the ladies like.
Attachment 2447
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkXrTt7s97I
Re: Halo: Anniversary - The Halo 1 remake (fuck anyone who calls it "halo ce" remake)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kornman00
Funny, I don't recall quoting or referencing a Bobblehob post (or even mustaches for that matter) in my post
*re-checks*
Yep, wasn't replying to you. However, since you want it to be about your gripe about peopling griping about mustache: the "HD" version of the game should have just been a true touch up, literally what the game would look like if it had been made with today's technology. Evolution. Not transformers where a truck can turn into some walking & derping killing machine. 1 + 1 = 2. It does not equal three. Or four. Or three. The minute they started to not do this, the community was well within their right to make 9000+ pages of WHAT THE FLYING FUCK DID YOU DO TO X posts.
This place has a couple handfuls of members, so if the majority of them are tweaking out about some detail, chances are they are all going to post about it. Then you have the anti-tweakers (eg, you) who then post about them tweaking out, only furthering the massive tweak fest that is unfolding. Hence the couple of pages that were mostly about the silly mustache Johnson is sporting in HA10.
If you're going to do something, do it fucking right, and stay true to the original along the way. Facial details, stomach sizes, derp-faces, etc shouldn't needed to be mucked with. They wanted to re-use H3/Reach assets? Fine, whatever, but they should have stuck to a standard. Gonna use MF'ing Reach trooper (ie, army) models for HA10 marines (!= army)? Then use H3's Johnson as well. Don't go reinventing the wheel, with different materials, in the HD "remake" of a game.
I cannot begin to fathom why they didn't just use the Reach Keyes model either, as that was pretty "10 years later" shit already.
Bungie: sometimes ignored non-game fiction, but was actually iterative on the original designs as they moved forward.
343i: keeps in mind fiction from the books, but seems to have some point to prove that they're at the helm now and are not Bungie, so we have all these changes. Changes to equipment and mood may make sense for H4, with humans having researched Forerunner tech and new settings, but this Halo1 dammit. Halo1 characters.
But hey, at least we can just play the game in 2001 mode, amiright marines modacity? Mmmhmmm, damn right I am.
Hopefully the manual/credits will shed some more light on the remake artists, so we can see who we really need to grind our axes with at the end of the day.
If it wasn't obvious, I love you.
Re: Halo: Anniversary - The Halo 1 remake (fuck anyone who calls it "halo ce" remake)
