Re: So the upcoming CoD: MW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Lobo
Excessive use of the smug smiley and pro-gamer attitude in this thread.
Still playing CoD4, can't wait for this game, should be amazing.
:lobo:
:realsmug:
If there's no G36C in MW2, I will be sad. I am incredibly good with this rifle.
Re: So the upcoming CoD: MW2
It's role is already supplemented by the AUG and L85, I think. The FAMAS probably replaces the M16A4 considering in the video it shows it firing 3 round bursts. It looks with the ACR ingame the M4A1 carbine is not around this either.
Re: So the upcoming CoD: MW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rosco
:realsmug:
If there's no G36C in MW2, I will be sad. I am incredibly good with this rifle.
G36C ninja fo life, tbh
all you MP5 scrubs don't know
Re: So the upcoming CoD: MW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DELTA_011692
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that thing is impossible to shoulder wield for more than 3 minutes at a time. Just look at how the bipod is set up and how reinforced it has to be. The mag of .50 cal rounds is probably nearing 15 lbs on its own. The baret is meant to be a stationary anti armor/crazy range platform like in MW1 campaign. I found it amusing how it was unlockable as a multiplayer weapon. Just watching guys spam around with it no-scoping like a shotgun made me lol.
I've actually held an M82 before. It weighs roughly 30lbs maybe a bit less fully loaded. The average person could not shoulder fire this weapon (because the average person doesn't go to the gym...>_>). Though it maybe only be 30lbs, the weight distribution makes it difficult to hold, with most of the weight being in the barrel, therefore most of the strain is on your left arm only. Magazine, fully loaded, weighs no more then 5lbs.
It is very possible to shoulder fire an M82, however running around spamming it like a pistol its not going to do well for your shoulder an most likely balance...
Re: So the upcoming CoD: MW2
I wanna see a Prestiege edition of the game but like... four times as ridiculous/unnecessary and GTA V
That would make me excited for the game.
Re: So the upcoming CoD: MW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ifafudafi
Balance > Realism. No attachment (in theory) should make a gun superior, and the accuracy decrease was designed to uphold that.
Balance can go eat cock. It's what 'ruined' RO (still a very good game, but not what it could have been) and what has threatened to ruin a wealth of good games since.
Re: So the upcoming CoD: MW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
343guiltymc
You want realism, but also want a a 50 cal with silencer?!
I think I read somewhere that "contrary to popular belief, the Barrett 50 cal sniper rifle can accept a silencer in real life."
Re: So the upcoming CoD: MW2
*doesn't know shit about guns, comments on guns anyway*
*is 90% of the internet userbase*
Re: So the upcoming CoD: MW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rossmum
*doesn't know shit about guns, comments on guns anyway*
*is 90% of the internet userbase*
Well I read it at http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Barrett_.50_Cal
Tell me if the source is wrong.
Re: So the upcoming CoD: MW2
I wasn't talking about you, thought the "90% of internet userbase" would make it clear I was just making a fairly general statement