Is that a 6.5 or a 9mm?
Printable View
Is that a 6.5 or a 9mm?
6.5 IIRC
I'll just share this latest gem with you guys.
I replied with this:Quote:
I will tell you the same as I tell all you video war gamer punks !
Man up to your total Bull Shit your mosin is some target grade rifle,bring that hunk of shit inaccurate Mosin and 5000 euro for bet money you are going to loose because at 600 out to 1000 yards you are not going to even touch paper !
There is a reason mosin rifle's cost 99 dollars, these guns are a hunk of Russian crap !
You punks need to lay off smoken crack and the video war games !
I also called him out in another reply for being an illiterate moron, so this should be fun. Wanna take bets how long it is before he starts trying to threaten/intimidate me? Seems to be a pretty strong correlation between anyone who still uses 'punk' as a derogatory statement and ignorant old nationalistic shitheels who think they know it all and anyone who steps to them is gonna 'get it'.Quote:
Ah yes, dismiss it out of hand. I'm a collector, you fuckwit, and I know as much about Mosins as you do about hunting rifles. You clearly value accuracy which is just fine. I am under no illusions of making accurate shots to 1000+ yards, but I am also not going to expect your rifle to stand up to years of abuse in a massive war the same way you seem to think anything that can't shoot under MOA at 500yd is 'junk'. They were cutting edge tech... 68 YEARS AGO. Clearly they are outdated now.
I mean holy fucking shit you're stupid. You may as well challenge someone in a Model T to race against your Ferrari, you fucking idiot.
Against a WWII Kar98k, an M1903, or an Enfield, the Mosin performs just fine. Of course some done-up custom rifle with modern parts will outperform it. At the time it was made it was far from a 'piece of junk'. I may as well compare a Krag to an F2000 and then say all US rifles are shit, according to your logic that's a fair comparison, right? Retard.
There's a metal tab on each tin you pull to open the can, no can opener needed just a hand and muscle power.
And my god I am laughing my ass off to rossmum's reply to that guy, since well the gene pool is a bit shallow and people need some reminding to how retarded they are.
He's still arguing. If older shooters wonder why the younger generations don't have as much respect for them as they probably ought to, idiotic assholes like this are the reason. 30 years' experience as an Alaskan guide and gunsmith... and still the dumbest motherfucker on the face of the Earth.
e/
Back to kindergarten insults? Usually a good sign of an impending meltdown. This'll be good, better go grab some popcorn while I just throw cheap shots at him to wind him up! :allears:Quote:
You are a funny mosin Russian fanboy !
You sure get all pissed off like your squirrel size balls are in a pinch over stupid things !
I sure hurt your mosin Russian fanboy feelings LOL !
188 was Novosibirsk IIRC.
Top line - Calibre (7.62mm)/bullet type (L - tombac, lead core, 147gr spitzer)/case type (GZh - copper washed steel)
Bottom line on these cans is slightly different to the later ones, usually letter (cartridge lot #)/year/factory, then powder type/batch over year/powder source. That does seem more '46 than '67 though so I dunno what the fuck. They may have simplified the layout, or it could've been repacked - or the 46 could be something else. I dunno why they'd be putting out ammo on Mosin strippers in '67 though.
e/ That crate is marked 'Germukuporka' which I assume means it was for the occupying forces in E. Germany
e2/ '46 fits with Type L production which ended in '54 (LPS began '53)
Also, wish I had this in desktop res
http://russiatrek.org/blog/wp-conten...-posters-3.jpg
Repacked makes sense
That ammo is sexy as fuck though
The genuine clips work pretty well loading the magazine.
Btw it isn't "Germukuporka" it's "гермоукупорка" which means it's hermetically sealed.