Apparently he didn't get the gist of your post, so I added more words and reposted. *shrug*Quote:
Originally Posted by Katarn
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnaFuBAR
WINWINWINWINWINWINQuote:
Originally Posted by Btd69
Printable View
Apparently he didn't get the gist of your post, so I added more words and reposted. *shrug*Quote:
Originally Posted by Katarn
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnaFuBAR
WINWINWINWINWINWINQuote:
Originally Posted by Btd69
well i meant smoothing error. didn't know it'll cause much chaos 0.o
EDIT: wow im confused. what were we talking about again? PLZ tell me where it's inaccurate besides the highly undetailed handle
It's not even a smoothing error. It's called a non-planar face. It's a plane that stretches in three dimensions, which is not possible. In other words, it's a geometric nightmare.
It's not bad, but there is still a lot of small detail missing. For example, there is no magazine release.
aaahhhh. thanx for pointing that out. (wow i'm slow) is that why it's inaccurate because of many small details like that?
You pretty much just need more reference images. Try www.modelguns.co.uk.
Or you can try Wikipedia. Just type in the gun name and scroll down to External Links. You can find a lot of good references for individual parts of the gun.
I dont see any 4 mini SMG's though :(
It's not that hard to find refs of... look on Google, and don't say you can't find any because if you use the right keywords, you should be able to get plenty.
The first thing I thought of when I saw this gun was "Awww, ain't that a CUTE uzi?" I don't mean to sound offensive at all, but that's the first thing I thought. It actually looks very nice, but as previously mentioned, needs more detail in the places previously mentioned.
I'm going to have to repost my 3D critiquing thread again, aren't I...
I call for lock.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnaFuBAR