Printable View
Didnt watch video, just watched your sig for a few minutes
/thread
Oh name calling. Thats cool and progressive of you. Congrats.
I read everything written up until that video, which I did not watch. I actually believe you are right on this, but you continue to act like an asshole any time anyone disagrees with you or tries to be funny in one of your threads. Than you start labeling people and so on and so forth. So yeah, other than reading for my own interest, I usually try my best to NOT comment on what you say. And I didnt. And you attacked me anyways. So go fuck yourself.
My response probably would have been different if you had given some indication that you didn't just walk into the thread and go, "hurr hurr tits distracted me from nollij".
Why? The exact problem here is that you didn't comment on what was being said, and instead made some totally irrelevant post?
Because like every other person on the internet, I have learned you are not looking for a discussion. You're looking to shove your beliefs down the throats of others. Even when King trys to make an argument against you, you try to boil it down to semantics instead pf actually taking a moment to think about what hes saying and arguing against it. Your point about the purpose of the Libertarian party is exactly what I'm talking about. You know exactly what he meant. He was talking about an economic belief system. Instead, you chose to say "hurp durp not actually the definition of libertarians derf".
Tl;DR /too ranty:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQl5aYhkF3E
If I wasn't looking for a discussion, I wouldn't post these kinds of threads.
Beliefs? What fucking beliefs? Please, search through this thread for me and point out every belief I have presented as a fact.
:raise:
huh, who here is talking about a Libertarian party lol?
He was saying Libertarians are something they are not, and I corrected him? How awful?
It seems to me you only post these topics to convince people of your preference in government/economy that you gained via information you found fitting to be evidence to justify your preferences. Correct me if I'm wrong though, please.
I'm just going to leave my 1.5 cents here:
Technology will always take jobs from other places, and as technology advances it will do that even more so. The very purpose of technology is to increase the efficiency of a certain task.
But from what I've seen, advances in technology (or anything else, really) will always be stunted while subservient to capital.
No, I post these topics to highlight the problems with our current centuries old system. I don't understand why some people seem to think that explaining to them why Capitalism is failing, and was always doomed to do so from it's conception because of many structual flaws it posesses, is somehow forcing my views on them. I have never told anyone they have to choose the solution I currently support, heck I've only posted it here once or twice, because before we can even discuss that, it is far more important that people first understand why we need a new system in the first place.