Yes, but it's good to plan ahead...8800GTS 320 has the best bang for the buck right now, go for it.
Printable View
Yes, but it's good to plan ahead...8800GTS 320 has the best bang for the buck right now, go for it.
Orrr
If you're running cheap, get an x1600xt (256) PCI-e for about $80, and be quite satisfied.
Antec 900
Silverstone 1kw PSU
Intel Quadcore QX6700 - Oc'ed 3.3
2x 8800GTX Gfx Cards
Asus P5n32-E sli plus
2x Corsair Twin2x2048 6400C4
4x Samsung 250gb Sata2 hdd's in 2x 500gb raid 0 arrays
Thermalright SI-128 Heatsink
:) Decent setup from what i've seen :o
Ok, well I was wanting the ATI HD2900, but now I've seen this. My mind has changed. This has a little lower specs (Very little) in 2 areas. But the price, you can get a very little higher in the ATI HD2900 for 80 bucks more. I think that isn't worth it. Plus this has more MB. So my likely one to buy is the nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS. Unless someone thus changes my mind once again. (not likely)Quote:
Originally Posted by xterohx
That happened to me in Halo PC with my dual-core, just open task manager, right click the process, set affinity, and disable one of the processors.Quote:
Originally Posted by [FBI]Xetsuei™
Fortunately for you, the 8800GTS 640mb out performs the HD 2900xt.Quote:
Originally Posted by termin8or123
Poot ATI...in DX9, they owned. In DX10, they're 8 months behind nvidia...
The only thing that worries me is the problems I have heard regarding nvidia's Vista drivers. Is this onld news that has ben rectified, or are there still hiccups here and there?
They're good now.Quote:
Originally Posted by p0lar_bear
a Radion X1950 if you dont want your machine to be aten by the HD
The x1950PRO is brilliant. Go for that. And yea ATi > Nvidea. Also Vista drivers for ATi are better than Nvidea's.