I'm not advocating it. I'm saying it would be a bad thing.
Printable View
But I don't equip tubes or launchers zzzzzzzz
but light vehicles would justify the existence of such launchers. Because right now, lol.
The point I'm trying to get across is that vehicles that can be accessed whenever ready would be less effective than actual controllable killstreak air support. With killstreak air support you don't have to control anything but the gun, the game does the flying which keeps you focused on killing. The only air support that is actually hard to shoot down is an AC130, and it's not like that would be a whenever ready vehicle. Most often when you get air support in MW2, especially on domination, it gets shot down fairly quickly. With whenever ready vehicles being harder to control, and just is easy to shoot down, I doubt they would be much of a problem.
So I'm going out on a limb here and saying that controllable killstreak air support gets you way more kills then whenever ready vehicles, therefore being more annoying/more of a hassle.
Besides, AC130s are slow. It wouldn't matter.
Safe to say more people on modacity will be playing Halo Reach in Fall 10 then CoD: BO. Or unless Treyarch manages somehow to make a good game play video and such. Thou I will probably rent cod instead of letting my grandparents get me it for my b-day. Depends on what they can show more in a real video.
Hmm... what does Modern Warfare + Vehicles (+ destruction) equal?
I went to frys the other day, and a dude walked up to me and asked which he should buy, modern warfare 2 or bad company 2. I laid out the facts in front of him. He thanked me and walked away with bad company 2, as well as bioshock 2, which I also sold him on.
his name was tree