Slightly late but that size comparison is pretty meaningless. Vast but undetailed and fast travel times versus smaller but packed full of content and designed to be traversed on foot.
Printable View
Slightly late but that size comparison is pretty meaningless. Vast but undetailed and fast travel times versus smaller but packed full of content and designed to be traversed on foot.
:(Quote:
Originally Posted by PlasbianX
There's only one plane in A3 right now and it's a piece of garbage. Also it's fugly as hell.
Have you played the Arma 3 maps? They are very well detailed and meant to be traveled by foot. Arma's main focus as a series is on infantry combat. Vehicles are just in there to widen the scenarios.Quote:
Originally Posted by Btcc22
Nope. It came directly from the mod creators.Quote:
Originally Posted by PlasbianX
This and this equals sex.Quote:
Originally Posted by PenGuin1362
Right but the detail that is there still doesn't even compare to the likes of GTA and WoW (since it's on other comparison images).Quote:
Originally Posted by Amit
My god. Thank you. I really need to learn the asset pipeline for this gameQuote:
Originally Posted by Amit
Arma 3 is so cinematic sometimes.
I must get this
The beauty of it is that I wasn't even playing the campaign or anything. I was just testing out an update of the camo pattern I'm working on in the editor and decided to play with the lighting to see how it looks in daylight shadows. I'll probably turn off depth of field next time so most of the scene isn't blurry. If there was more light on the soldier, then it would have been more clear that the focus was to be on him rather than the environment, but the shadows prevent that.
Developers should start doing things to make smooth the transition between the ground and the bottom of the tree...that hard seam is jarring.
Some people just know how to take proper screenshots:
