Articles Funny Random

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Con

How is that funny? (in b4 funny vs random debate)

---

It comes under random.
I mean who would have thought someone who had both arms amputated would be allowed to drive a car let alone a Subaru Impreza?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by =sw=warlord

It comes under random.

---

And we've discussed before that this is for funny articles, the "random" meaning that they're not tied to any sort of topic or discussion.

Yeah, I'm changing the damn thread titles back.

I really liked it better when I thought that this was a thread for articles of general interest. not every article has to be funny to be worth a read.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICEE

I really liked it better when I thought that this was a thread for articles of general interest. not every article has to be funny to be worth a read.

---

This.
There have been plenty before me linking to random articles and now you're going to sulk because I linked one?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by p0lar_bear

And we've discussed before that this is for funny articles, the "random" meaning that they're not tied to any sort of topic or discussion.

Yeah, I'm changing the damn thread titles back.

---

You seem to have misunderstood the reason I created this thread. That was the original thread title you just mangled, Polar! Both PFR and AFR have always been about funny/random, not always funny & random. I thought you understood this? I've explained it to everyone who's tried to shoot down a post of something that wasn't exactly funny, but was still interesting. You're the last person I thought would think otherwise.

This is my thread, that is my intention, and I'm changing my damn thread title back the way I made it.

mod fight!

Then you can change this thread title back.

PFR, however, was originally supposed to be for funny pictures as outlined above. Kornman got bored one day and messed with the order of the words in the thread title, and since then there's been confusion.

So where do we put pictures that are of general interest, yet not particularly humorous? Make a separate thread for them? That seems a tad ridiculous. We already have a "best pictures you've seen" thread, and I think even that is pushing the decentralization a bit.

I always thought the current system of 'the best pictures you've seen' and PFR worked well because if it's awesome and funny, it goes in PFR, and if its awesome and not funny it goes in 'the best pictures you've seen'. If it's not awesome, probably nobody cares to see it.

I think the entire thing is clunky. We could sticky 3 threads

Pictures of particular intereste

Articles of general insighte

Videos for your probable entertaine

All funny and interesting things would be filed under their corresponding threads.

How is this a freaking issue