Re: Battlefailed 4 (It got better, but it's still a fail that I paid $84CAD for)
Hey guys, some issues have been happening in my personal life that I don't want to talk about too much, but they're the reason I acted the way I did, so heres a minute and a half of me ranting insincerely about how this is a chance for me to grow as a person while not showing a shred of humility despite being shown to be a complete fuck head.
I don't want to talk about my personal issues though!
Re: Battlefailed 4 (It got better, but it's still a fail that I paid $84CAD for)
At nowhere during that video did he mention anything he did to Dolce or twoscotsman (the guy who made the mind-blowing "Through My Eyes" machinima trailer). How can we accept an apology if we don't know exactly what you're apologizing for?
His response on a reddit thread where he was called out was the following:
http://i.imgur.com/tI4JhfB.png
Source
Re: Battlefailed 4 (It got better, but it's still a fail that I paid $84CAD for)
What a minute, what did I miss?
Re: Battlefailed 4 (It got better, but it's still a fail that I paid $84CAD for)
One of the guys that was involved with that well done machinima that was posted a few days ago is a complete scum fuck, and now that he's been called out for being a scum fuck, he's issued this really vague, insincere apology.
Re: Battlefailed 4 (It got better, but it's still a fail that I paid $84CAD for)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Donut
One of the guys that was involved with that well done machinima that was posted a few days ago is a complete scum fuck, and now that he's been called out for being a scum fuck, he's issued this really vague, insincere apology.
Well, only the trailer for Point Blank was released. The "Through My Eyes" machinima by Twoscotsmen (the one everyone went crazy for) is a separate project that has no relation to this situation.
Re: Battlefailed 4 (It got better, but it's still a fail that I paid $84CAD for)
Turns out that the poster of that video had been marking replies as spam and has since put the video to private after people called him out on it.
Re: Battlefailed 4 (It got better, but it's still a fail that I paid $84CAD for)
I need friends, add me
PopeAK49
Re: Battlefailed 4 (It got better, but it's still a fail that I paid $84CAD for)
So, apparently there was an update to the game to make the netcode less atrocious. Can someone confirm the ability to turn on high-frequency netcode 'ticks' ?
"
Options>Gameplay>Hi-Frequency Network Update.
Set it to high.
"
Re: Battlefailed 4 (It got better, but it's still a fail that I paid $84CAD for)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dwood
So, apparently there was an update to the game to make the netcode less atrocious. Can someone confirm the ability to turn on high-frequency netcode 'ticks' ?
"
Options>Gameplay>Hi-Frequency Network Update.
Set it to high.
"
Can confirm.
Re: Battlefailed 4 (It got better, but it's still a fail that I paid $84CAD for)
Yeah, they had been testing improved tick rate in the community test environment. It turns out it made a huge fucking difference, so they patched it into the vanilla game. With network update set to high you both send and recieve packets at 30hz, instead of the way they had it before where you sent packets at only 10hz. Battle(non)sense did a video showing how the higher tick rate improves the game (seen here, skip to the 30hz / 10hz testing section).
To the dev who said improving the tick rate wouldn't make a difference at all and was impossible: Fuck you.
