Also, the second nanosuit looks like a guy wrapped himself in MIDI cables or something.
Printable View
Also, the second nanosuit looks like a guy wrapped himself in MIDI cables or something.
Meh, I like the second one better, it's got more beefy protection.
:downs:OMG NO ITS CALLED REQUIEM FOR A TOWER IT WAS FRUM LORD OF THE RINGS THE TEW TOWERS.:downs:
Also, this is the dumbest shit.
Suit looks worse than the old one.
Anyway, Crysis would be a good game if, and only if:
It was STALKER SoC,
It had borderlands weapon system;
Had crysis graphics,
Far Cry 2 Vehicle system,
GTA4 world detail.
That's what crysis could have been, but no. Big pond to play in, same fish everywhere.
For once a FPS actualy executes a pretty good open world design and people complain about it.
For one i actualy enjoyed crysis for what crysis was, an open world FPS that had a decent system set up.
Sure there were a few physics stuff that needed improving like when you flipped a vehicle upside down but in general i think crysis was pretty good.
Yeah, unlike some games where it's so open eowlrd you don't know where your supposed to be going.
An FPS can only go so far before it gets boring and confusing.
The Halo series and Doom series are good examples of how FPS are usualy very linear where as with crysis, you could drive to a enemy camp, swim, cross a rope bridge or go through the forest completely up to you.
actually i kind of agree with dane. partly because ive always felt like crysis was just a tech demo for ce2, wasnt really that fun!!
I still don't understand why (and find it quite amusing that) they want to get people hyped up with a viral campaign about a new character model of all things.