My friend games on a 27ms (yes, that's not a typo) response time LCD, and he does it well with no complaints.
My 24" has a 5ms response time, and I can "just" notice a difference between mine and his (clone mode).
My friend games on a 27ms (yes, that's not a typo) response time LCD, and he does it well with no complaints.
My 24" has a 5ms response time, and I can "just" notice a difference between mine and his (clone mode).
pixel response time has nothing to do with input latency. Pixel response time is the measurement of how fast it takes for a pixel to change from one color to another, not how fast the signal takes to be displayed on the monitor. A faster pixel response time will get you less ghosting, but not much else.
Where the fuck is input latency listed then?
http://www.memoryexpress.com/Product...17409(ME).aspx
Get 'splaining.
It's never listed... up to you to find out what it is :)
Yeah, they totally pull the wool over your eyes and hope you don't notice.
Well, I have no issues what-so-ever so I don't even care.
It's odd, when I play Halo 3 on my monitor, the input lag is unbearable. But when I play Call of Duty or any other 360 game it's fine.
It's because YOU FAIL.
Probably because Halo 3 is somehow directing the Xbox to use a frame buffer of some kind.Quote:
Originally Posted by JunkfoodMan
I think it has something to do with the fact that Halo runs at an artificially increased resolution.