Page 14 of 22 FirstFirst ... 4 12 13 14 15 16 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 218

Thread: Upcoming Title Update

  1. #131

    Re: Upcoming Title Update

    the reach magnum is not what I'm comparing the pistol to.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #132

    Re: Upcoming Title Update

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkHalo003 View Post
    In the AR's defense, if you use short-controlled bursts it's an excellent crowd-control weapon. And guess what? I use Reticle Bloom to use it so effectively and properly.
    For the last time people, nobody here is complaining about bloom on automatic weapons. To clarify, when people complain about bloom they're complaining about the addition of increasing spread to precision weapons. Nothing else.

    Quote Originally Posted by t3h m00kz View Post
    the reach magnum is not what I'm comparing the pistol to.
    As I've said many times before, the Pistol's spread is constant and unchanging which makes it not a random factor but a predictable one. Yes, you can increase it by holding down the trigger but nobody with half a brain cell ever does that and I can't believe anyone would make such a stupid argument.
    Last edited by Pooky; September 18th, 2011 at 03:26 AM.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #133

    Re: Upcoming Title Update

    pointless

    whatever

    you win
    Last edited by t3h m00kz; September 18th, 2011 at 04:58 AM.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #134
    Senior Member =sw=warlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dalek Crucible
    Posts
    5,331

    Re: Upcoming Title Update

    Let me get this straight pooky, You're complaining that a precision weapon has bloom because it adds "randomness" to your shots and might make your shots veer off your target whilst at the same time complaining that people who spam said weapons "might" get a lucky shot?

    Had there not been any bloom at all, the spammers would be an even bigger issue.
    "hay guiz we're gettin spammed and we dun leik bloom so plz remov bloom so we can spam back k thnx bai!"

    Your issue is not with bloom, it's with the ridiculous amounts of auto aim, sit in a revenant passenger with a sniper and see just how many head shots you get and you'll see what I mean.

    The issue is not the bloom, if you honestly believe it is you are extremely vain.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #135

    Re: Upcoming Title Update

    Quote Originally Posted by =sw=warlord View Post
    The issue is not the bloom, if you honestly believe it is you are extremely vain.
    Jesus christ I can't believe I have to repeat this yet again

    teekup: the reticule bloom is pointless because the gun is fucking hitscan
    YEAH LET'S PLAY JEDI KNIGHT 2: all the reticle bloom does is add a little more randomness at point blank range
    YEAH LET'S PLAY JEDI KNIGHT 2: that's not even the main complaint I have with the DMR, which I've highlighted at least 10 times, but for some reason everyone just harps on the bloom thing
    Yes, in my opinion bloom is annoying and dumb. But it's NOT the main problem with the DMR NOR is it the main problem with Reach multiplayer in general.

    The difference between the Pistol and the DMR is where the Pistol has a clearly limited maximum range, the DMR does not (within the bounds of any of the official maps). Also while the Pistol requires actual aim to use at close range, with the DMR you can just spam and follow up with an auto aiming super lunging homing melee attack.

    This is my complaint with the DMR/NR. The DMR's retarded range prevents open maps from having any sort of flow, while its spammability up close makes it not only obnoxious but less skilled to use compared to previous mid-range weapons in the series. Note that 'spam' doesn't have to mean firing as fast as possible. Just firing slightly faster than normal is enough to make it annoying. A lot of Reach proponents claim to hate the BR from Halo 3. Imagine how much more obnoxious it would be with unlimited range and the ability to fire FASTER at close range.
    AM I GETTING THROUGH YET?
    Last edited by Pooky; September 18th, 2011 at 06:12 AM.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #136
    Senior Member =sw=warlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dalek Crucible
    Posts
    5,331

    Re: Upcoming Title Update

    So basicly, your complaint is that gameplay over rules realism?
    If you want weapons with no spread go play CoD, don't shit up Halo with your need for everything to be "realistic".

    You really are vain, Seriously, if your complaint with the DMR is that someone may get a lucky shot [which judging by your bitching has never happened to you before] then WOW.
    With or without bloom, there would still be lucky shots.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #137
    Kid in the Hall Kornman00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    ◕‿◕, ┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘
    Posts
    3,126

    Re: Upcoming Title Update

    ITT: pooky rages
    Reply With Quote

  8. #138

    Re: Upcoming Title Update

    Not my fault some people are so amazingly stupid they can't comprehend plain English. How exactly does one translate

    Removing bloom would be good
    to

    NEEDS MORE SPREAD
    Last edited by Pooky; September 18th, 2011 at 12:06 PM.
    Reply With Quote

  9. #139
    Senior Member =sw=warlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dalek Crucible
    Posts
    5,331

    Re: Upcoming Title Update

    Not my fault you get trashed by casuals and cannot comprehend the possibility of adapting to the situation.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #140

    Re: Upcoming Title Update

    Yeah, because I said anything to that effect.

    It's not like I record every game I play, but ask teekup, mech, ducky, or any other people I've played Halo with in the past. My skill is definitely not the issue.
    Reply With Quote

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •