Quote Originally Posted by Warsaw View Post
You didn't assert it directly in the Reach thread, but you did it indirectly to the confusion of the rest of the forum until I came in and said exactly what it was you were implying (while agreeing with it). Go read it. That's basically how it played out. I also remember you getting called a fanboy in there, too. There's nothing wrong with being a fanboy as long as you aren't throwing insults at people for disagreeing with your opinion.
What exactly did I assert? That Reach is shit? Being a 'fanboy' demands being a 'fan' of something. Comparing the game unfavorably to Halo 1 doesn't mean I'll automatically bash people for liking Reach better. I will bash people for calling Reach a serious competitive platform, which it most definitely is not.


Quote Originally Posted by Pooky View Post
Halo 2 doesn't need a remake. It just needs a straight port to 360 via Arcade with modern resolution and online co-op. If only for the exploring and goofing around aspects, Halo 2 had the best Campaign of the series and I want it more than the first game tbh.
Okay, so I could have worded my post a little better. Let me try again.

Quote Originally Posted by Pooky View Post
Halo 2 had in my opinion the best Campaign for exploring and goofing around, particularly on cooperative.
If that's really the source of this whole retarded 'debate', can we end it now and just agree to disagree?

Quote Originally Posted by Warsaw View Post
No insults have been thrown around in here, so...
No they haven't, and I sincerely applaud you for your maturity.