dano and wol said it all.
halo can run this thing perfectly fine. whether or not your card can handle it is another story. lucky for me i can run it just fine. ^_^
if yours can't...well then...sucks for you![]()
dano and wol said it all.
halo can run this thing perfectly fine. whether or not your card can handle it is another story. lucky for me i can run it just fine. ^_^
if yours can't...well then...sucks for you![]()
And another thing, honestly why keep lingering on past gen games anyways phase? Seriously, a good way to expand on your modelling skills is to move on to better things like source and such that can take the 9-10 thousand tricounts. You could damn near model all the battle damage into the thing with that much stuff to toss around, but it would take an experianced modeller to do so. I think it's good that Penguin can move on from the silly tricounts of halo 1. Realize that games coming out, the ones that penguin will most likely be part of developing, require the skill to make a detailed 7-8 thousand tri count object. And I don't want to hear none of that pussy texture shit. I read up just awhile ago on the crysis engine that it would be more worthwile to model the details on then use higher res textures, normal maps, etc. Believe it or not, those create lag too. Games are being geared towards higher tricounts. Embrace it.
Well, I have my Desert Eagle model as a W.I.P*. I just started it today this morning. If you see anything I can change let me know. becuase i want it to be just right....
![]()
Well, it's completely wrong so far, @.@ Start over, look at the pictures a little more closely. What you have is not even close.
I don't remember the Desert Eagle looking like that in the front..........
What picture are you even going by that it looks like that?
Ok i made this, I think this is freaking sweet.
\http://s127.photobucket.com/albums/p152/VernAncelet/The%20Last%20Blue/?action=view¤t=test3copy.jpg
Vern, the font could be more interesting. I don't like it.
Also, Daax a Desert Eagle looks more like this:
![]()
Are you gonna go around in every thread posting that?
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Bookmarks