Quick-Crit 2008-2009

[Chainsy]

Obviously were both stubborn as mules and wont budge our opinions any further then the other will. And Ive think weve gone off topic for way too long. I havnt been trying to insult you, and when you start to cuss in frustration is when I decide to stop this debate. If your that mad as to result in that rude comment, I wont participate in this anymore, if you truly desire to continue this, though I would be utterly stumped to as why, you can contact me in the pms. Since no one else other then rossum has any opposition towards the design, I will continue up with a full cocnept.

[rossmum]

I haven't insulted anyone so I don't know what the hell post you've been reading. Clearly none of my other 8,000-odd, otherwise you'd realise I swear like fucking crazy no matter what kind of mood I'm in.

Don't accuse me of trying to be rude when I'm damn well not, thanks.

[Chainsy]

Your not helping your cause.

[Timo]

This stops here.

[Kalub]

I'd prefer if it didn't though. It seems ross can argue....



Who knew?
If you don't know I'm kidding kill yourself, also +rep ross

[rossmum]

This stops here.

does 'this' include his inability to take honest criticism without flaring up or not

also

[Chainsy]

Its looking good, but can you show us how they work on a moving target or in a frantic situation?

[Hunter]

Final:


Poly Counts;
Polys: 3, 703
Verts: 5, 149

Separate Images:
Top View
Front View View
Side View
Back View
Perspective 1
Perspective 2

[PenGuin1362]

nice projection setup. Also post a wireframe and tri count. Right now it looks rather good but wireframes are important.

[Hunter]

Wireframe:

I got to go now though so I will get you a tri count another time.