Pardon Our Dust.

[Kornman00]

That's why the crates were actually vehicles.

Masters never brought up the fact that he was implementing crates as vehicles when I was talking to him on how to solve his limit problems. Must be why he didn't want to stick with the game's vehicle limit

[Mr Buckshot]

Yeah, the "movable crates" can go, as they really aren't useful, unless there's a way to make it such that you can push them around simply by walking into them. But as UnevenElefant5 pointed out, that doesn't seem to be the case. Removing the "movable crates" would free up some tag space, right?

[Inferno]

And if the crate touches you moving at 1mph it will instantly kill you.

[Hunter]

Think about how much they would free though, what can be replaced by it? Not much tbh, because they dont take up much room. And I thought there was no space issues any more... Because the UI has been removed.

[Kornman00]

Think about how much they would free though, what can be replaced by it? Not much tbh, because they dont take up much room. And I thought there was no space issues any more... Because the UI has been removed.

A vehicle object consumes more object memory than a scenery object does. Not only that but processing a vehicle would take up more CPU as well. I'm beginning to think the only reason they surpassed the 80 vehicle limit was due to these movable crates...

[Hunter]

I didnt know that Lmao.

[Amit]

rofl

[MacPanama]

any progress on this?

[teh lag]

any progress on this?

Yes.

However, we don't feel that much would come from posting it.

You know, the same it's always been when we go a while (and it's barely been 2 weeks ffs) without posting anything?

[Kill001]

This needs its own homepage