Are you guys idiots?
Do you really think it's that difficult to make a successful and free online gaming network?
How many of you use steam???
Yes, to make it as simple and as good as Xbox Live, yes. If they aren't making it free, then that means they have enough people paying to get max profits. Somebody in marketing probably went "Oh, if we make this free we could get more users and get more ad profit."
I would believe it. We'd probably see a MA MA MA MA MASSIVE increase in players while MS would introduce more adverstisements. Perfect combo for them. I think they do realize that people won't like the ads, so they won't do as much; then people can pay to get them removed.
Last edited by MetKiller Joe; May 18th, 2009 at 07:33 PM.
My Xbox died a few months ago and I still pay for XBL...
I dunno, the console gaming market is extremely different than the PC gaming market. I wouldn't really compare it to steam because of all the things that M$ does on the XBL service. Personally I think it's well worth the $50 a year for it.
But then again, I heard on a forum that this guy's friend's teacher's dad's sister who works at microsoft overheard a convo about XBL saying that bill gates wants the service to be free.... so it must be true.
LIVE is good because it cost money. Have you ever played on the PS3 network? You always lose connection. I have never had that prolem with LIVE. As for Steam. I'm sure Steam has a lot less user on it then LIVE.
And doesn't steam charge for downloading games?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks