Modern Warfare 2

[Pooky]

Inferno, I don't even use auto aim in CoD4 360 :S

you can disable it in the options, and I prefer it that way. I find the aiming controls smooth and intuitive enough that I don't need assistance to hit my targets. I don't see the point of your anti-console crusade.

[Inferno]

Because consoles don't give you a choice of controls. And I hate that.

[PenGuin1362]

online co-op. that is all. and stop decreasing the fucking accuracy when using ACOG. it's called ADVANCED combat optical gunsight for a reason. It provides better grouping then a normal scope at closer range...

[Inferno]

CoD:WAW had online co-op so I would hope that CoD:MW2 will have it to.

Also yes the ACOG should be more accurate.

[343guiltymc]

CoD:WAW had online co-op so I would hope that CoD:MW2 will have it to.

Also yes the ACOG should be more accurate.

There is co-op, it's a mode called special forces. They ACOG needs a bigger POV.

[Ifafudafi]

online co-op. that is all. and stop decreasing the fucking accuracy when using ACOG. it's called ADVANCED combat optical gunsight for a reason. It provides better grouping then a normal scope at closer range...

Balance > Realism. No attachment (in theory) should make a gun superior, and the accuracy decrease was designed to uphold that.

Of course, then the GL came into play and we lost all sense of balance, but that was the intention.

As for co-op, they won't be having a campaign cooperative mode, but instead they'll be doing what's called the "Special Forces mode." Basically, it takes all the awesome level ideas that IW couldn't fit into the story and allows you to play them seperately with a friend. They say the levels are in the spirit of Mile High Club from CoD4, which has me sold already.

[Champ]

Contrary to popular belief PC gaming can be (and for me IS) cheaper than console gaming.

If you would like a explanation then go ahead and ask.



M4 beats G36c in about everyway. Because the m4 is really really really fucking good.

edit-

I don't "suck" with console controls I just hate them. I'm like level 35 or something in halo 3. Console controls just don't provide a solid enough base and not as large a range of motion. They also are not as fluid as pc controls. The ONLY advantage is you can walk slow with the analog stick but that's the only thing I envy of it.

edit 2-

And to back up my arguement.

Console Shooters have auto-aim.
PC Shooters do not (although sometimes there is a tiny amount).

The reason?

Because on a console its hard as shit to aim with 2 nubs. So they added auto-aim and magnetism to help you (ala Halo 3)
PC controls do not need this shitty magnetism because on the PC you can actually aim.

edit fucking 3-

Don't get me wrong I use a controller for Super Smash Bros and Gran Turismo 3. But shooters just don't adapt well to nubs.

got damn edit 4-

One last thing to add. I played my first shooter on the game cube. I played the shit out of night fire and agent under fire. I eventually heard of this really popular shooter game called "halo" and i bought it for the PC (since i didnt want a xbox)
Instantly loved the mouse controls and adapted to them quite fast. Never let go of them.

oh gawsh 35 in halo 3? thats amazing dude, and your life story is even better..i was on the edge of my seat through the entire thing. you sound like the most ultimate gamer ever, do you teach lessons?

oh and i would also like an explanation, please tell me more about how it is cheaper. I'm all ears

[DrunkenSamus]

Bigger explosions and more destructible props in multiplayer.

[Inferno]

oh gawsh 35 in halo 3? thats amazing dude, and your life story is even better..i was on the edge of my seat through the entire thing. you sound like the most ultimate gamer ever, do you teach lessons?

oh and i would also like an explanation, please tell me more about how it is cheaper. I'm all ears

Did I say 35 was amazing? No. It's above average though.
Do not trole.

As for cheaper gaming.

Most kids who play video games have parents. These parents generally have a middle of the line computer (todays standard is like dual core processor 2gigs of ram integrated audio and integrated video with a 120gb HD)

My parents have a computer similar to that (lower specs though). So one day I get Bioshock at a store. It turns out the only thing on my computer that is not able to run the game is my graphics card. So I went online and bought a $120 GFX card and installed it on my open PCI-E slot.

Since that point I have been able to run every game that has come out on the medium or high settings.

All I had to pay for was the graphics card. Which totals at $120 bucks.

The xbox I bought was $400 + Extra controllers another $60
or so + XBL $60 a year.

Which is cheaper?

[Saggy]

Did I say 35 was amazing? No. It's above average though.
Do not trole.

As for cheaper gaming.

Most kids who play video games have parents. These parents generally have a middle of the line computer (todays standard is like dual core processor 2gigs of ram integrated audio and integrated video with a 120gb HD)

My parents have a computer similar to that (lower specs though). So one day I get Bioshock at a store. It turns out the only thing on my computer that is not able to run the game is my graphics card. So I went online and bought a $120 GFX card and installed it on my open PCI-E slot.

Since that point I have been able to run every game that has come out on the medium or high settings.

All I had to pay for was the graphics card. Which totals at $120 bucks.

The xbox I bought was $400 + Extra controllers another $60
or so + XBL $60 a year.

Which is cheaper?

If only it was that easy for me... I have to get a new CPU, and anything thing that will play today's games costs upwards of $300... So, Xbox for me (It's only $200)