Quick-Crit 2008-2009

[Rentafence]

Cool, looks the the real one.

[Hunter]

@MrBig.

I will unwrap when I can be bothered and send it to you Lol.

[Roostervier]

From now on keep personal messages personal; PM him. Seriously, you didn't even shamelessly add in something stupid to keep your post on topic.

[Hunter]

Last time I checked there where two posts conserning what I said about the unwrap, that is mine, above. and MrBig saying that he would give it ago.

Also, it is ontopic as it is discussing something I posted in the last page. He asked a question, so I answered it. There is no need for you to bitch about this all of the time, although the last time you did I can understand as I more or less had a convo in the public forum...

[Futzy]

[BobtheGreatII]

I don't understand... did you make that?

[Futzy]

.
Why else would I post it.

[BobtheGreatII]

.
Why else would I post it.

What did you make it in? Come on man! Give me some details here. Was it a vector?

[Futzy]

Yes, of course it was a vector.
I will be posting the finished version with a background on my deviant art soon.
e: http://avpdragon.deviantart.com/art/Bender-131915426

[neuro]

I used Nurbs and Deform Modifier.

Cool sub-div modeling. Can we see the wires of the un-smoothed version so we can see if your doing it right?

i call this a double-fail.
he clearly sais he used nurbs, yet you ask for a wireframe of an unsmoothed version.

idk, but i guess you didn't connect the dots where NURBS does not equal sub-d?
this results to me believing you wouldn't really be a fair judge on whether or not 'he's doing it right', considering you yourself seem to barely have understanding on 'how it's done right'.

excuse my rant.
edit: woops, didn't see this was 5 pages down already.