Rainbow was just a term I used to denote multicoloured suits.
Also, we heard they were Sparta-IIIs from a second hand source. Even if they are Spartan-IIIs, they were all equipped with SPI armour, which had a form of active camouflage anyways.
S-III's were suicide soldiers and basicly prototypes, they could have any combination, because their prototypes they could have been used for experimental armour.
If the SPI wasnt shown on the cover for ghosts of onyx no one would even be bitching about what a S-III looked like.
Most of all, no one notice how you can customise your armour in halo 3 MP? Gee i guess they just put that there for shitz and giggles and not be any part of canon.
All but two of the original S-IIIs were killed before Ghosts of Onyx, and that book takes place after Halo 2 anyways,
Gee i wonder what killed them all...
which is long after Reach was glassed. Bungie's game world or not, it would be extremely sloppy for them to drop Spartan IIIs into Reach from a Halo-lore standpoint.
How exactly?
=|
Also, there were variants of the Mk. V, as mentioned in the Halo Encyclopedia (Security is one of them). I think what some of us are complaining about the chunky disproporionality in the trailer.
Yes because this time the armour actualy looks like plates of armour not just extrusions from the rubber beneath it.
It looks straight-up stupid and not at all conducive to the fluid, almost ninja-like movement that the Spartans are supposed to have.
Who said their no longer stealthy or powerful? they look more fearsome now than they did before, IE look at the halo 3 armour, it was basicly a cast of shwartzneggers chest painted green, carved chunks out and then said oh hey heres your chest plate.
Even the Mk. IV as described in the book was sleeker than what we saw in the trailer.
Bookmarks