Quote Originally Posted by Amit View Post
Medal of Honor is an instant no-buy.

Why anybody would drop $60 on this game is completely beyond me. I played through the campaign on the hardest difficulty level in 4.5 hours. There's a serious problem there. That was including the 40 minutes I spent trying to fix the bugged out second mission when calling in airstrikes due to the laser being cock blocked by a building. There is no way to fix that without restarting the level. The amount of the restrictions is so great, even more invisible walls are in place than BC2's campaign. Oh and by comparison to any game that has been released in the past two years, the campaign has the worst graphics I've seen. BC2's graphics are soooo much sharper and clearer.

The only good thing I can say about the campaign is that it has some epic moments nearing the end of the campaign. Still, when the game was finished, I was left asking: "This is it?" Something that I said similar to the cliffhanger ending for Halo 2. You end the last mission expecting to head to the next one and then the credits start to roll, but not before they throw in a random cutscene about the obvious sequel.

Now for the multiplayer, it was developed by DICE so the multiplayer portion was buttloads better than the campaign. The graphics were better, the gameplay was a tiny bit smoother, but it is way too easy to kill people. One shot to the foot with a sniper rifle shouldn't kill somebody. Not even if its hardcore mode or whatever.


Black Ops actually looks to be shaping up with the ridiculous amount of detail, content, and balancing Treyarch is putting into the game. I'm still with Pooky on this one, though.
I got the game free so maybe I'm being biased but:

1. The graphics where not that bad at all.
2. I liked the story. (Especially the ending)