Page 17 of 23 FirstFirst ... 7 15 16 17 18 19 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 223

Thread: [WIP] GuiltySpark

  1. #161

    Re: [WIP] GuiltySpark (formerly HaloBot)

    This isn't about cheating. It's about making a usable "AI" to drop into games and populate servers.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #162
    Whiter than Sour Cream d4rfnader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    19

    Re: [WIP] GuiltySpark (formerly HaloBot)

    Sorry, but, I thought modacity was against aimbot usage?
    Reply With Quote

  3. #163
    Neanderthal Dwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Wouldn't u like to know?
    Posts
    4,189

    Re: [WIP] GuiltySpark (formerly HaloBot)

    Quote Originally Posted by Freelancer View Post
    This isn't about cheating. It's about making a usable "AI" to drop into games and populate servers.
    .
    Reply With Quote

  4. #164

    Re: [WIP] GuiltySpark (formerly HaloBot)

    Quote Originally Posted by d4rfnader View Post
    Sorry, but, I thought modacity was against aimbot usage?
    Reading the entirety of a thread before posting is generally a good idea. I highly suggest you do that in this case. Maybe even just read my last post that Dwood kindly quoted for you.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #165
    Whiter than Sour Cream d4rfnader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    19

    Re: [WIP] GuiltySpark (formerly HaloBot)

    Oops, sorry about that, I misunderstood. I took "usable AI to control the player" as, aimbot. =P
    Reply With Quote

  6. #166
    Neanderthal Dwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Wouldn't u like to know?
    Posts
    4,189

    Re: [WIP] GuiltySpark (formerly HaloBot)

    daerp.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #167
    HA10 Limited's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,800

    Re: [WIP] GuiltySpark (formerly HaloBot)

    Righto I have some free time, I'll get onto testing
    Reply With Quote

  8. #168
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1

    Re: [WIP] GuiltySpark (formerly HaloBot)

    Im willing to do some testing PM ME
    Reply With Quote

  9. #169

    Re: [WIP] GuiltySpark (formerly HaloBot)

    Quote Originally Posted by SniperBOT View Post
    Im willing to do some testing PM ME
    No.

    Here's why.

    Quote Originally Posted by Conscars
    I'm going to be holding a private beta soon. If you are interested in testing and/or making node graphs, please shoot me a PM. I'm only going to be accepting people that I know I can trust not to share it. If I don't already know you, then don't bother. The anti-aimbot measures won't be added until after testing is done. I may also put a cap on the number of people who are in the beta.
    You have ONE post, and you signed up just to post it with a name like "SniperBOT". You sound like some kid looking for the newest bot on the block to inflate your already overinflated e-peen by pretending to be good at a VIDEO GAME.

    Now that's just my opinion. You may have perfectly good reasons for signing up and wanting to test. But I can tell you right now, it's not going to happen. You make an account to make ONE post requesting to test a (currently) very sensitive piece of programming, and you ignore everything the creator specified about criteria. Does Conscars know you? No. Did you send HIM a PM? No. You came here and made a post requesting he PM YOU! *laugh*
    Reply With Quote

  10. #170
    chilango Con's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    8,397

    Re: [WIP] GuiltySpark (formerly HaloBot)

    Quote Originally Posted by SniperBOT View Post
    Im willing to do some testing PM ME
    u trollan?

    For everyone not in the beta, lots of progress is being made. I'm close to giving the testers the third beta build which will drastically increase the bots fighting capabilities. It's not too late to still join the beta, just don't ask like that guy ^. I need someone who will push the program to its limits by trying to break everything. Let me know if you can think outside the box and test some unusual usage cases.
    Reply With Quote

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •