Page 34 of 378 FirstFirst ... 24 32 33 34 35 36 44 84 134 ... LastLast
Results 331 to 340 of 3780

Thread: Battlefield Tri-hard

  1. #331
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,656

    Re: Battlefield 3 (updated 3/30 - FULL GAMEPLAY DEMO, part 3)

    I can see how the L85 could be shoehorned in, but not the G36. Germany broke all compatibility standards with it, so it has no place.

    The RPD or DPM (RPD=modernized DPM=modernized DP-28) should definitely make an appearance in the game. At the very least, throw us an RPK, DICE.

    The SMLE would be one of those bonus guns like the M1. Good alternative for snipers who want to play in close quarters but still need the punch of a sniper rifle for range work.

    Speaking of guns, I hope they bring back team-specific loadouts. I loved that "different but equivalent" element of Battlefield 2. The SVD was shit at long range, but it totally whacked the M24 at medium range. The only OP gun in the game was the AK-101.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #332
    For Auir! ODX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Michigan, United States
    Posts
    1,561

    Re: Battlefield 3 (updated 3/30 - FULL GAMEPLAY DEMO, part 3)

    New and official screenshots:
    http://epicbattleaxe.com/image-galleries/battlefield-3/

    Holy shit...
    Reply With Quote

  3. #333
    Amit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malden
    Posts
    8,505

    Re: Battlefield 3 (updated 3/30 - FULL GAMEPLAY DEMO, part 3)

    It's nothing we haven't seen before.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #334
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,656

    Re: Battlefield 3 (updated 3/30 - FULL GAMEPLAY DEMO, part 3)

    D'aw, got my hopes up. Most of those are not new.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #335
    For Auir! ODX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Michigan, United States
    Posts
    1,561

    Re: Battlefield 3 (updated 3/30 - FULL GAMEPLAY DEMO, part 3)

    Well I hadn't seen them before...only a few but a lot were still unseen to my eyes.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #336
    Amit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malden
    Posts
    8,505

    Re: Battlefield 3 (updated 3/30 - FULL GAMEPLAY DEMO, part 3)

    Oh wait, sorry, the second image I had not seen before, but it's nothing really new other than a different scene where a soldier is hit and is being dragged away.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #337
    Gar TVTyrant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    4,690

    Re: Battlefield 3 (updated 3/30 - FULL GAMEPLAY DEMO, part 3)

    Quote Originally Posted by Warsaw View Post
    I can see how the L85 could be shoehorned in, but not the G36. Germany broke all compatibility standards with it, so it has no place.

    The RPD or DPM (RPD=modernized DPM=modernized DP-28) should definitely make an appearance in the game. At the very least, throw us an RPK, DICE.
    Why do compatibility standards matter in a video game? I'm pretty sure that the game wouldn't much care if it used STANAG magazines or not, tbh. Plus, its a neat piece of equipment that is pretty damn advanced compared to the M4s, L85s, and AKMs of the world.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #338
    Amit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malden
    Posts
    8,505

    Re: Battlefield 3 (updated 3/30 - FULL GAMEPLAY DEMO, part 3)

    We don't know that the U.S. and the Iraqi Insurgency are the only combat factions in the game. It does take place all over the world so I expect to see some more NATO states involved. I would guess that the G36 will be in the MP.
    Reply With Quote

  9. #339
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,656

    Re: Battlefield 3 (updated 3/30 - FULL GAMEPLAY DEMO, part 3)

    Quote Originally Posted by TVTyrant View Post
    Why do compatibility standards matter in a video game? I'm pretty sure that the game wouldn't much care if it used STANAG magazines or not, tbh. Plus, its a neat piece of equipment that is pretty damn advanced compared to the M4s, L85s, and AKMs of the world.
    It matters when the game is trying to convey a real-life scenario within its context.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #340

    Re: Battlefield 3 (updated 3/30 - FULL GAMEPLAY DEMO, part 3)

    You know there's a magazine well replacement that accepts STANAG magazines for the G36 right? I'm not talking about the airsoft version either, there's a real one:
    http://www.hkparts.net/shop/pc/AR15-...apter-p800.htm

    Takes less than 10 seconds to swap out, and you can do it on the battlefield if needed. I know that if I were a member of a military in a country that uses G36 and was deployed on a NATO mission I would buy one of those and take it along. That way I could make the switch to the STANAG mag well in cover if I ran out of normal G36 mags, then call for a mag from someone with a STANAG rifle if there were some around.
    Reply With Quote

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •