Page 545 of 577 FirstFirst ... 45 445 495 535 543 544 545 546 547 555 ... LastLast
Results 5,441 to 5,450 of 5765

Thread: Halo: Reach Discussion

  1. #5441
    Tick Gate 2014 Donut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    RIT
    Posts
    2,828

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    dual spikers were effective on hunters in halo 3? i usually just stand back and throw every grenade thats lying around on the floor, then shoot them in the back until theyre dead. i dont think i ever even played halo 3 all the way through on legendary

    hunters in reach on legendary is just miserable, but at least thats on legendary. the fact that theyre so tough on normal just seems off to me.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #5442
    Curious Cat
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    9

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    You have to consider that these games take place in different periods of time which would explain the strength however, I don't really think this is a 'story' decision.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #5443

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Donut View Post
    dual spikers were effective on hunters in halo 3? i usually just stand back and throw every grenade thats lying around on the floor, then shoot them in the back until theyre dead. i dont think i ever even played halo 3 all the way through on legendary

    hunters in reach on legendary is just miserable, but at least thats on legendary. the fact that theyre so tough on normal just seems off to me.
    Spikers in Halo 3 stun the Hunters every time they get hit... dual spikers fucking annihilate them.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #5444

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Reach hunters are just way too powerful to be fun to fight. Full of massive damage/one-hit kill/undodgeable BS like the rest of Reach. I preferred ODST's the most.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5445
    State your identity! Hotrod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    5,282

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Left6 View Post
    You have to consider that these games take place in different periods of time which would explain the strength however, I don't really think this is a 'story' decision.
    There's only a few months difference in between Halo 3 and Reach, and only mere days between Reach and Halo 1. And you can't explain the difference between Hunters the same way you can explain there not being Brutes in Halo 1. It's merely a gameplay decision.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #5446
    Curious Cat
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    9

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Hotrod View Post
    There's only a few months difference in between Halo 3 and Reach, and only mere days between Reach and Halo 1. And you can't explain the difference between Hunters the same way you can explain there not being Brutes in Halo 1. It's merely a gameplay decision.
    I agree, as that was the point I was getting to.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #5447
    Senior Member =sw=warlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dalek Crucible
    Posts
    5,348

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Pooky View Post
    Personally I was glad that Hunters finally became an actual threat. They were complete pushovers in Halo 1, 2, and 3, provided you were properly equipped for them. Pistol or sniper in 1, sniper or beamer in 2, dual spikers in 3.
    This.
    Also Hunters need more AA like sprint, Armour lock or even....



    ....Jet packs.

    Reply With Quote

  8. #5448
    Gar TVTyrant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    4,690

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion



    I love the smell of Napalm in the morning...
    Reply With Quote

  9. #5449
    Senior Member Champ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    256

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    So I played Reach for the first time with my little brother. Fun game, but I do have some gripes about it...

    1. The way Kat died. So dumb.
    2. 2 of your teammates die by suicide. Not right... Master Chief can take out a scarab but you can't... ?
    3. You're the only one to survive to the end and you have no other missions so you just fight to the death. Come on, there's still humans on Reach, so there _HAS_ to be missions you can do, what a lame way to end the game.
    4. of course all other Spartans died... I just wish they hadn't.
    5. Hunters take 2 rockets to kill on normal. That shouldn't be possible.
    6. You can flip a tank but you can't punch out a jackal and its shield in a melee... on normal.
    7. Sprint is awesome.
    Master Chief is a Spartan II, they were Spartan III's, except for Jorge. So they couldn't carry MC's jockstrap. Also I enjoyed Jorge's and Hasley's little moment when they first encountered in Reach. FUCK CARTER JORGE SHOULD HAVE BEEN LEADER
    Reply With Quote

  10. #5450
    Kid in the Hall Kornman00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    ◕‿◕, ┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Jorge was pure muscle and a git-er-doner, not a leader
    Reply With Quote

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •