Page 170 of 220 FirstFirst ... 70 120 160 168 169 170 171 172 180 ... LastLast
Results 1,691 to 1,700 of 2191

Thread: The best pictures you've seen.

  1. #1691
    Senior Member ICEE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: The best pictures you've seen.

    Quote Originally Posted by n00b1n8R View Post
    You all realise the reason they used ancient hardware is because it's tried and tested and far more reliable than modern technology. Every time your computer crashes is equivalent to a shuttle blowing up. Now tell me they should update.
    Yeah im pretty sure thats not the reason but ok!
    Reply With Quote

  2. #1692
    Gar TVTyrant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    4,690

    Re: The best pictures you've seen.

    Quote Originally Posted by ICEE View Post
    Yeah im pretty sure thats not the reason but ok!
    Its why the Russians never invented a shuttle system. Their rocket program worked and works fine and they didn't want to fuck it up.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #1693
    Senior Member ICEE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: The best pictures you've seen.

    But NASA (and other organizations) come up with new hardware plans and ideas all the time. The reason some of them don't get made isn't because "well what if it doesnt work the first time", reasons vary from thing to thing. For instance Project Orion , a theoretical (and fucking awesome) ship powered by nuclear explosions. We have the technology to build it. If we built it, it could revolutionize space exploration. We don't build it because it would violate treaties that ban nuclear tests in space. Other ideas never come to fruition because $$$, or because it simply isn't necessary. When they launch telescopes however, they do use increasingly awesome hardware, like the James Webb.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #1694

    Re: The best pictures you've seen.

    Quote Originally Posted by n00b1n8R View Post
    You all realise the reason they used ancient hardware is because it's tried and tested and far more reliable than modern technology. Every time your computer crashes is equivalent to a shuttle blowing up. Now tell me they should update.
    Hey this isn't the reason at all, but even if it were I'm pretty sure they don't use Windows so 90% of your issues would be irrelevant right there. Oh ad I haven't experienced a PC crash that wasn't related to faulty hardware or overclocking (see: my fault semi-on purpose) in years.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #1695
    Gar TVTyrant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    4,690

    Re: The best pictures you've seen.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cortexian View Post
    Hey this isn't the reason at all, but even if it were I'm pretty sure they don't use Windows so 90% of your issues would be irrelevant right there. Oh ad I haven't experienced a PC crash that wasn't related to faulty hardware or overclocking (see: my fault semi-on purpose) in years.
    Not since I got Windows 7 have I had any kind of crash

    I havent turned this laptop off since September of 2010
    Reply With Quote

  6. #1696
    Bitchin' Sitar Solos nuttyyayap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    409

    Re: The best pictures you've seen.

    Quote Originally Posted by TVTyrant View Post
    Its why the Russians never invented a shuttle system. Their rocket program worked and works fine and they didn't want to fuck it up.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran_(spacecraft)
    HTH
    Reply With Quote

  7. #1697

    Re: The best pictures you've seen.

    Meh, unmanned space-flight is better anyway. Same goes for combat aircraft.

    I'm not talking AI/Autonomous vehicles here though, that's just a bad idea. You want to have remote-controlled vehicles so you get the skill and expertise of a human pilot, but the capabilities and lack of death of a completely mechanical vehicle. For example, the F-22 Raptor (and many other fighters) can technically out perform the pilot. That means that the aircraft is capable of performing maneuvers that would leave a human unconscious due to G-Forces and the like.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #1698
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,656

    Re: The best pictures you've seen.

    But nobody cares if you land a robot on Mars. The public needs something to get excited about if you want to keep the budget up.
    Reply With Quote

  9. #1699

    Re: The best pictures you've seen.

    Landing robots on Mars is really exciting actually, except when they get hung up on rocks and end their voyage the excitement kinda dies down.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #1700
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,656

    Re: The best pictures you've seen.

    It's exciting to people like us. It's not exciting to your average guy. I've tried drumming up space talk many times, they just don't care. They are amazed at us landing on the moon, but not about landing a metal machine on Mars.

    I mean, which sounds cooler to you?

    "I just landed my probe on Mars."

    "I just got back from walking on Mars."
    Reply With Quote

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •