Why have you got such a big problem with it? I never saw anyone get mad about GoW's choice of colour.
Yeah what in the Hell? So you're whiny about the color scheme. It's how the fucking game is without hacking it. Get over it. You knew what you bought. What do you expect? I don't want some prick having an advantage over me because he can modify colors. It's bullshit and you're all retarded for complaining about it.
How the fuck is removing a filter which effectively desaturates the game somehow giving someone an advantage?
If we're going to make everything equal then let's make the game console exclusive, make it mandatory that we can display the game on only one TV model with no deviation in resolution or clarity and make sure no one can add attachments to their weapons.
The point of playing on PC as opposed to console is so you can make the suit suit to your tastes, not have ridiculous stipulations plastered onto your usage.
Last edited by =sw=warlord; October 23rd, 2012 at 07:07 PM.
I can see it being an advantage on stationary targets as they'll definitely stand out more against their background, but for moving targets I doubt it'd make a difference. But at the end of the day it's their own choice, vote with your wallet. Valve are the only ones that allow lefty flipped view models. Every other game's animations and guns looks retarded in my eyes, but you don't see me kicking up a big stink about it.
Seriously, they're not "fucking" anyone with this choice. It's their game NOT yours. Developers slave over these projects because they love it (or just haven't burnt out yet). And you people are nit picky over the dumbest shit. You obviously didn't care until someone released the mod so it clearly never mattered that much to you. If this were a bigger issue other than a simple visual style that launched with the [widely successful] game then I could understand, but it's literally the most ridiculous thing to get upset over.
Holy shit man, its a color scheme, get over it. What do you expect when you are using programs that fuck with the game they made. Some developers are okay with that, others aren't obviously. Expecting them to just be cool with it is ludicrous and you know it. I could understand getting bent out of shape if they removed the server hosts ability to change settings on their server or something, but not this.
The game might be their product but in the end, it's the consumer who has to put up with the discrepancies.
They've made announcement after announcement which they've not followed up on.
What happened to VOIP?, Battlecorder?
If this colour filter was as small of a deal as you make it out, why then are DICE actively banning people over it?
the program which removes the filter should be no bigger of a threat to DICE as changing the hue on the monitor, but wait, DICE said last year that BF3 wouldn't have a editing kit because of how badly tangled the engine is yet they're actively seeking to licence the engine out now.
Not to mention the relative ease that editing tools have been made for the game.
Last edited by =sw=warlord; October 23rd, 2012 at 08:14 PM.
Not really the discussion at hand, referring specifically to the complaints about color grading. But no one's making you put up with anything. And just because shallow promises were made does not make it yours. The consumer didn't sacrifice sleep and a normal work schedule and extreme deadlines to complete the project. You fork over $60 and boom you get to play. Also not saying that developers should get away with making empty promises, especially when you do have to fork over that much money, but too many "gamers" are self entitled little twats, but that's a discussion for another day.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Bookmarks