Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: Steampunk is really stupid, WE ASK WHY

  1. #31
    chilango Con's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    8,397

    Re: Steampunk is really stupid, WE ASK WHY

    Quote Originally Posted by El Lobo View Post
    What in the hell is going on in here
    idk I think some people are taking steampunk seriously
    Reply With Quote

  2. #32
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,647

    Re: Steampunk is really stupid, WE ASK WHY

    Dude...this is Modacity...
    Reply With Quote

  3. #33
    Senior Member ICEE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,692

    Re: Steampunk is really stupid, WE ASK WHY

    Quote Originally Posted by Warsaw View Post
    Hey now, I segued back into the topic...

    E: And this is how you airship:

    Hey lets go back to talking about this


    I like the style of the angular airship.. are there more concepts like it? I'm basically done with the typical final fantasy style of airship (Giant whale looking things in the sky).
    Reply With Quote

  4. #34
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,647

    Re: Steampunk is really stupid, WE ASK WHY

    I actually have one other type that is meant to be an older variant (think pre-dreadnought vs. dreadnought) of it. I'm in the process of making a page containing profile comparisons among the types (Old Battleship, New Battleship, New Gunship, New Carrier). Still working on the rival faction's versions. I call them Panzer Luftshiffen (PzL).

    Reply With Quote

  5. #35
    GLORY TO ARSTOTZKA rossmum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    the atrocity exhibition
    Posts
    13,763

    Re: Steampunk is really stupid, WE ASK WHY

    move the planes and double up. should have one pair fore and one aft. a single large pair by what would be the sail on a sub is distinctly modern-looking, if you're going for the subs of the sky vibe then it should be a lot more visually similar to a ww1 u-boat.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #36
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,647

    Re: Steampunk is really stupid, WE ASK WHY

    I'm actually not. I'm going more for an "Iowa-class in the sky" look and I want it to have a keel. Two vertical planes would not give me the aesthetic I'm after and would harm turn ability because two rudders not on the same vertical line creates two separate turning points.

    Now, doubling up engine pods is something I probably will do. However, the nacelles are supplementary rather than dedicated. Primary forward thrust is provided by angling the lifting engines forwards. The nacelles basically give you a boost in whatever direction you need to go; it's one of the primary design differences between this later model and the ones before it. The downside is that you are consuming more steam and thus have less available to power your cannons.

    These things stay aloft by combining heated up helium inside self-sealing bags to increase buoyancy and downward thrust to make up the rest. The heating is provided by catalysed decomposition of hydrogen peroxide; the primary product of such a reaction is steam, which is used to drive the turbofans. Excess is sent into the main guns, which are kept loaded at all times, then to point defence, and then to condensers where the water can be reheated or used for drinking/hygiene. Whatever can't be reused gets vented underneath, forming a billowing cloud at altitude.

    Yes...I know how to airship.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #37
    GLORY TO ARSTOTZKA rossmum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    the atrocity exhibition
    Posts
    13,763

    Re: Steampunk is really stupid, WE ASK WHY

    Oh, I meant doubling up lateral planes, not longitudinal.

    Either way, yeah, I see it now.
    Reply With Quote

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •