Best Graphics?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daishi

ARMA II maxed graphics really isn't that good. It takes a powerful computer, sure, but that's just because of the draw distance. :/

---

So I'm guessing its like a worse, more buggy version of FC2?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bhamid

So I'm guessing its like a worse, more buggy version of FC2?

---

To be completely honest, I think farcry 2 had better view models, but ARMA II has pretty good environments. ARMA II's view models and animations were absolute trash.

To directly answer your question, yes, you could compare it to that. But minus all the action at every corner going on with farcry 2.

Is this mainly a multiplayer game like BF2? I didn't even know such a game existed, it looks pretty cool. I was a big fan of the huge ass open sandbox battles that were the likes of BF2.

Arma 2 is garbage, it plays like shit, and looks like shit.

So crysis.

Is this thread a joke? Crysis is so much more advanced. :ohdear:

ArmA is a military-used simulator...as such, graphics are not the chief concern and neither is performance on our rigs which don't happen to be super-computing clusters.

Thus, Crysis. Or id Tech 5 (see RAGE).

Are there any ingame screenshots of RAGE?! All I saw were concept art.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 343guiltymc

Are there any ingame screenshots of RAGE?! All I saw were concept art.

---

Yes, they were in the most recent issue of GI. Look pretty badass.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBM9ywsJ_zY
8 TEXTURES AT FULL SPEED

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrBig

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBM9ywsJ_zY
8 TEXTURES AT FULL SPEED

---

Not to mention cubic environment mapping! :iamafag: