Gallery Topic (post your favorite work, or WIP's)

[CtrlAltDestroy]

curve editor* <_< But yeah, it's awesome.

[Tweek]

WHATEVER!

[FRain]

Yeah, tried it out a bit on my sniper, then my sniper went into a ditch (literally, it got fucked up) and I stopped using it. Maybe I'll use it.

[Tweek]

then you fail, and have to try again.

just because you fail, doesnt mean you should stop.

hell if you did that all the time, you wouldnt be alive right now.

[FRain]

Lol, yep, using it now.

Makes it look better, most definitely. I was using it the wrong way when I was using it with my sniper >_>

[Pooky]

Thanks to Kenney for the model.

the melee fucking sucks, everything else looks okay. Try a little harder to make the melee look like it could actually hurt somebody

[Jay2645]

get reference.

i have a plastic model of that thing on my shelf.

the head is soooo massively off, as well as the legs.

it's also waaaay too small compared to your little MC.

I'm using The New Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels, pages 8 and 9.

According to The New Essential Guide, the AT-AT is 15 meters tall and 20 meters long.
MC is 2 meters tall.
I literally made a tower of 10 MCs for scaling length-wise, and I made a tower of 7 1/2 MCs for scaling height-wise.
I also approximated the size of the legs and head by looking at the blueprints for the AT-AT found in the book.
The Body takes up about 2/3 of the length, and 1/3 of the height. This comes out to about 7 MCs long and about 2.5 MCs tall.
The neck is about 1 MC long, and about 1/2 of the height of the body, bringing it to about 1.25 MCs tall.
The head takes up the remaining measurements for the length, the height, which can be determined from the Blueprints, is about the same as the neck, compensating for the armor plating.

The legs, I admit, I took some guesses on, I just eyeballed what looked good and used that.

But it is to scale, the head actually does look like that, from the picture in The New Essential Guide, at least.

[Tweek]

well link me this guide, and go watch the movie, and play the games, and find size comparisons on internet, because they're way bigger than that.

WAY

if you want i can take pictures of the model, so you have some PROPER reference.

[Jay2645]

well link me this guide, and go watch the movie, and play the games, and find size comparisons on internet, because they're way bigger than that.

WAY

if you want i can take pictures of the model, so you have some PROPER reference.

http://www.amazon.com/Essential-Guid...4215297&sr=8-1
Not to mention that no one can really agree on the size of the Super Star Destroyer, Star Destroyer, or AT-AT, as any investigation into it always comes up with different results.
I figured the guide was as close to canon as I was going to get.

Not to mention that models are occasionally off-scale. The only other 2 sources I can get are these 2:

Agrees with my scale, but it's Lego. In fact, it actually wants me to make it smaller.

Agrees with your idea, but it is too blocky, and just doesn't look right. If they didn't get the look right, why would they get the scale right?
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/AT-AT
Wookiepedia entry. Says that the AT-AT is about 3.5 feet higher and 3.7 feet longer, but mostly agrees with the The New Essential Guide.
http://www.starwars.com/databank/veh...tat/index.html
Official Star Wars databank entry. Says that it is 15.5 meters tall, about 3.5 feet taller then my current model.

As I said, not all models are accurate, and the AT-AT's size is under much debate. For now, I'm going to go with the canon sources, though I might make it about 3.5 feet taller with the scale tool.

[Tweek]

do you always believe everything you read on the internet?