Quote Originally Posted by teh lag View Post
Frankly, unless you know exactly what the purpose is it's not a good idea to give stylistic criticism and then be angry when it's brushed away like that.
I'm not angry that he doesn't take my criticism. I don't care about the outcome of this project of his, I was only giving an opinion based on the information given, and of course, the picture. What irritates me is his attitude about criticism. It's all too easy to ignore posts, but he insists on being childish and attacking people.

On another similar occasion, on halomaps the other day, that wave of posts that he and masterz called "retarded" was entirely Danes fault. He posted a picture with a bunch of "conditions" that changed the appearance of the elite's shielding, plasma flares, glowing sword, etc, and without any explanation. Then he and masterz explode on the curious and uninformed replies like little children.

Quote Originally Posted by teh lag View Post
it's not up to you where "weathered and rusty" becomes too much, because it's not your vision.
If someones going to take that attitude, then why even post work?
Quote Originally Posted by teh lag View Post
Yes, Dano might have been more agressive than necessary, but that's what happens when you always have to explain what the style is because people focus on it rather than the actual content.
No, thats what happens your immature and recieve an unfavorable reply. What confounds me is that so many other members react exactly the same to criticism and get neg-repped to hell and banned for it. Terror and hunter are some pretty good examples of that. Yet its perfectly acceptable when Dane does it. Isn't that funny?