Page 6 of 23 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 16 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 226

Thread: Halo: Reach

  1. #51
    FOR THE EMPEROR! Jean-Luc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    1,833

    Re: Halo: Reach, Class Based Shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by ODX View Post
    I mean, they only revolutionized the genre with their unique touches and sold millions of copies of the games while doing so.
    I could do a horrifically detailed and angry rant about the bold statement, but I'll keep it a short answer. I don't think Halo revolutionized ANYTHING other than having recharging shields.

    That said, you are right about Bungie having a tried-and-true formula, and it definitely wouldn't make sense for them to change it, at least not much.
    Last edited by Jean-Luc; June 4th, 2009 at 11:28 PM.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #52
    Senior Member =sw=warlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dalek Crucible
    Posts
    5,331

    Re: Halo: Reach, Class Based Shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jean-Luc View Post
    I could do a horrifically detailed and angry rant about the bold statement, but I'll keep it a short answer. I don't think Halo revolutionized ANYTHING other than having recharging shields.

    That said, you are right about Bungie having a tried-and-true formula, and it definitely wouldn't make sense for them to change it, at least not much.
    Well if i remember correctly it was halo for the xbox that finaly resolved the fps aiming issues with consoles, i remember playing games like golden eye and not being able to look up very accurately and then halo came along and i found it very easy to control the camera.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #53
    Back for the Russian Halo p0lar_bear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,572

    Re: Halo: Reach, Class Based Shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by =sw=warlord View Post
    Well if i remember correctly it was halo for the xbox that finaly resolved the fps aiming issues with consoles, i remember playing games like golden eye and not being able to look up very accurately and then halo came along and i found it very easy to control the camera.
    Yeah, about the only thing Halo had going for it was that it was a very accessible console FPS. The aim assistance, control scheme, recharging shields over health, and the fact that grenades were tied to a dedicated button (as opposed to being a seperate weapon) are what made it appealing.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #54

    Re: Halo: Reach, Class Based Shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by p0lar_bear View Post
    Yeah, about the only thing Halo had going for it was that it was a very accessible console FPS. The aim assistance, control scheme, recharging shields over health, and the fact that grenades were tied to a dedicated button (as opposed to being a seperate weapon) are what made it appealing.
    Not to mention the materials system, advanced (for the time) AI, unusually deep plot for an FPS, and the slightly tactical two-weapon system.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #55
    Glorious Beacon of Light Disaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,022

    Re: Halo: Reach, Class Based Shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jean-Luc View Post
    Even a spartan couldn't survive the glassing of every inch of the planet's surface, and the boiling of the atmosphere.
    They didn't glass every inch because the surface contained forerunner artifacts. Some areas were left unglassed because of this. Atleast thats what I remember reading in First Strike.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #56

    Re: Halo: Reach, Class Based Shooter?

    A class based game COULD be cool if they did it anywhere near as good as TF2... Unfortunately all I know for sure is that it's a FPS that takes place during the fall of Reach, possibly with tie-ins to "The Fall of Reach" novel.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #57
    . .Wolf™'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    547

    Re: Halo: Reach, Class Based Shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by Disaster View Post
    They didn't glass every inch because the surface contained forerunner artifacts. Some areas were left unglassed because of this. Atleast thats what I remember reading in First Strike.
    Which he also said before..Read.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #58
    +rep to cure coronavirus n00b1n8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    13,213

    Re: Halo: Reach, Class Based Shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by ODX View Post
    Why, for any single second, would anyone think a Halo game with Bungie involved wouldn't be an FPS? I mean, they only revolutionized the genre with their unique touches and sold millions of copies of the games while doing so. It'll be interesting to see how this one unfolds.
    Quote Originally Posted by ODX View Post
    I mean, they only revolutionized the genre with their unique touches and sold millions of copies of the games while doing so. It'll be interesting to see how this one unfolds.
    Quote Originally Posted by ODX View Post
    I mean, they only revolutionized the genre with their unique touches and sold millions of copies of the games while doing so.
    Quote Originally Posted by ODX View Post
    revolutionized the genre
    This is a troll post, isn't it?
    Nobody actually thinks like this, right?
    Reply With Quote

  9. #59
    Kid in the Hall Kornman00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    ◕‿◕, ┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘
    Posts
    3,126

    Re: Halo: Reach, Class Based Shooter?

    Quote Originally Posted by n00b1n8R View Post
    This is a troll post, isn't it?
    Nobody actually thinks like this, right?
    How many FPSs before Halo1 had vehicles in their MP engines that weren't total shit? How many FPSs actually had such a large community following before then that including homebrew modding? How many FPSs actually implemented saved films of both your campaign and multiplayer action? I'm sure others can dive deeper into the exact concepts they tweaked and improved upon. Improvements are still revolutionary. They don't have to be fucking BLOW-YOUR-PANTS-OFF-AND-FUCK-YOUR-MOTHER-REMOTELY-VIA-AN-INTERNET-CONNECTION new shit to be revolutionary. Any idea, no matter how small, has a ripple effect to all others. What they do changes the thoughts of others around them who play their games and who compete for their players.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #60

    Re: Halo: Reach, Class Based Shooter?

    Well, tbqh, Half-Life was revolutionary. Halo was evolutionary (get the pun).
    Reply With Quote

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •