Pardon Our Dust.

[Roostervier]

Well, yeah, it does. That's the point of a videogame. If videogames were exactly the same as reality, what would the value in playing them be? The point is to do something that you either can't do in real life, or something that's impossible.

Yes but then why does halo have gravity or any other kind of realistic elements? Eliminating it all because some of it is eliminated is a stupid idea. It doesn't have to be completely realistic, but when everyone says the shoulders don't make sense (not to mention look bad), ignoring it is idiotic.

[Masterz1337]

Some people like the shoulders, and more importantly WE like the shoulders. Do the shoulders make sense? Bungie obviously thought it did or thought it was a detail so minor it doesn't even matter. They don't care about it, nor do we, nor should you.

[FRain]

Some people like the shoulders, and more importantly WE like the shoulders. Do the shoulders make sense? Bungie obviously thought it did or thought it was a detail so minor it doesn't even matter. They don't care about it, nor do we, nor should you.

Yet, we DO care. If it's so minor why dont you just go and fucking fix it then? It's not like it's that hard to move a piece of geometry so that you can see the shoulder. You're saying its so minor we shouldn't care, we're saying its so minor that you shouldn't have a problem fixing it. Jesus christ.

[Rentafence]

It doesn't have to be completely realistic, but when everyone says the shoulders don't make sense....ignoring it is idiotic.

Also, there's a difference between constructive criticism, and not liking a design choice.

Yet, we DO care. If it's so minor why dont you just go and fucking fix it then? It's not like it's that hard to move a piece of geometry so that you can see the shoulder. You're saying its so minor we shouldn't care, we're saying its so minor that you shouldn't have a problem fixing it. Jesus christ.

With the same logic you shouldn't even be arguing over it.

[Masterz1337]

Yet, we DO care. If it's so minor why dont you just go and fucking fix it then? It's not like it's that hard to move a piece of geometry so that you can see the shoulder. You're saying its so minor we shouldn't care, we're saying its so minor that you shouldn't have a problem fixing it. Jesus christ.

What if we don't care what you care? Do you care about the H3 armor perms "not making sense"?

We chose to give it EVA shoulders, end of story. As far as we're concerned there's nothing wrong with them.

[Roostervier]

What if we don't care what you care? Do you care about the H3 armor perms "not making sense"?

To set the record straight, I don't like the h3 perms either. I'd prefer to have only mark vi in multiplayer. Quit using that as an excuse. At least in your post prior to this you posted a real reason (the fact that cmt likes the shoulders) rather than just saying, "WELL BUNGIE THOUGHT IT WAS OKAY."

Still, the shoulders suck. <_<

[FRain]

I prefer the CQB in multiplayer because it is less bulky. And in the CQB perm, there is more than enough space to shoulder your weapon.

[ODX]

Honestly guys, unless you plan on taking a shit ton of screenshots that star the Master Chief, why the hell do you care so deeply about something as minor as the shoulders? You'll barely see them (don't start the crap about cutscenes again either) and he's not even rigged yet. They probably look better when the arms are held up, but still, you'll rarely see them.

I understand if you're trying to critique the biped in general, but you're still making way too big a deal.

[Heathen]

Look, if the shoulders get taken out I will be sorely dissapointed, as that is one of my favourite things about the new armor.

[Masterz1337]

To set the record straight, I don't like the h3 perms either. I'd prefer to have only mark vi in multiplayer. Quit using that as an excuse. At least in your post prior to this you posted a real reason (the fact that cmt likes the shoulders) rather than just saying, "WELL BUNGIE THOUGHT IT WAS OKAY."

Still, the shoulders suck. <_<

I'm not using it as an "excuse" I'm using that as a reason why we don't think its something important enough to consider changing. If we had no armor on the chest and just under suit, and you said, "that really doesn't make much sense, the most vulnerable spot is the least protected", then we would say "he has a point". Your reasons for wanting us to change it are

-It looks stupid
-its not realistic

Clearly, the first is your personal opinion, and as for being not being realistic, clearly people more experienced than you do think it's realistic enough, nor do we care if a small detail like that is deemed "realistic".