Call of Duty: Black Ops (NEW POLL!)

[PenGuin1362]

Dear Treyarch, get your own franchise and stop mooching of the ideas of other developers. Thank you. owait, I forgot you fail at being a development company so this is your only way to make money.

[Inferno]

Dear Treyarch, get your own franchise and stop mooching of the ideas of other developers. Thank you. owait, I forgot you fail at being a development company so this is your only way to make money.

Hey guys. Everyone is complaining about martydoom and Greanade Lawnchairs in CoD4. WE SHOULD PUT THEM IN WORLD AT WAR. IT'S A GOOD IDEA.

I'll bet you anything that there will be a new perk that allows you to hold 5 guns at once and reload them by spinning them around your fingers.

[=sw=warlord]

Hey guys. Everyone is complaining about martydoom and Greanade Lawnchairs in CoD4. WE SHOULD PUT THEM IN WORLD AT WAR. IT'S A GOOD IDEA.

I'll bet you anything that there will be a old perk returned call Juggernaut.
.

.

[Amit]

World at War had a decent campaign, which I actually enjoyed, but I can't say the same for the mutliplayer. I hope they learn from IW's mistakes in multiplayer, but I have a big feeling they won't. Just imagine if they come out with a system similar to IW Net?

I any case, MoH's campaign looks interesting.

[Rook]

World at War had a decent campaign, which I actually enjoyed, but I can't say the same for the mutliplayer. I hope they learn from IW's mistakes in multiplayer, but I have a big feeling they won't. Just imagine if they come out with a system similar to IW Net?

IWNet isn't that bad..it's ok how you get put in a game of your choosing with friends being on the same team at the start of a game instead of joining some half full dedi server with the game almost over. It would be a very viable system if they had official dedis set up for games instead of peer to peer.

[Amit]

IWNet isn't that bad..it's ok how you get put in a game of your choosing with friends being on the same team at the start of a game instead of joining some half full dedi server with the game almost over. It would be a very viable system if they had official dedis set up for games instead of peer to peer.

It actually is that bad. It matches you with hackers and people at the opposite end of the skill spectrum. IT ALLOWS HACKERS TO SEND YOU VIRUSES! It has to stop an entire game just to migrate to another host, often for 5 mins at a time, but then just crashes to the lobby. On top of that, the lag is just disgusting. Dedicated servers are no doubt the best option for online gaming. So what if you have to wait a couple of mins until the next round starts? I thought that was the point of jumping into the action right away. And who says you have to join a half full server? You can join a server that has any amount of people in it and you can still play with your friends. Also, dedicated servers can handle a lot more people and not be limited to a ridiculously low amount of people because the match making system can't keep up with it.

[ODX]

My biggest problem with the piece of shit is me rage quiting a game, then searching for a new one in the same playlist (like Domination since my team is always trying to play TDM >_> ).

What happens? The fucker puts me back in the same server I just quit from. I mean it's not like I instantly try to search again, but you think it would have some sense to find a new game, out of a couple thousand people playing a few hundred games. Honestly, no excuse.

[Warsaw]

I don't understand this host migration thing. Do games over Xbox Live get hosted on one of the player's Xboxes or something? If so, why the fuck are we paying $4 a month for multiplayer we should have when we are the ones hosting the goddamn games?

[Cortexian]

Most Xbox games are hosted on someones console, you're just paying for the matchmaking servers and such.

[Warsaw]

Oh wow, that's a load of crap...some of us don't even WANT the matchmaking services and would rather just browse a list of games...