Results 1 to 10 of 1331

Thread: Quick-Crit 2010

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    got dam forumers.... SnaFuBAR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,159

    Re: Quick-Crit 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Cagerrin View Post
    Is it your monitor? I'm not having any trouble with it.

    It looks great until you realize it's just a colour shift. After comparing it with the original, it just doesn't seem to have a night-time atmosphere anymore.

    (maybe it's just my monitor making it too bright)
    plz adjust your monitor black/white point and gamma. thx.

    Ross, as said before, too dark. Also, the fire on the aircraft is too contrasty and brings it forward. The fire on the tanks could use some work, too, as in the explosion looking bits on the tops of the flames are bad. Try something else with the tracers as well, because they're very fuzzy streaks as of right now and i feel that your depth of field jumps around way way too much. Those aircraft should all be nothing more than silhouettes, especially since the houses (being relatively midground) are lacking detail that you can plainly see on the aircraft. I know you're crazy about the aircraft, but your personal like of them is showing much more over wanting to produce a quality piece of work. This happens with almost all of your work. Not to mention, with the fire coming off the destroyed tank, you need a LOT more local light. The shadows in your scene are all sunlight source at high noon, which is BAD BAD BAD. Make all of your shadows with a quick falloff/gradation/softening and be sure they actually taper towards the object casting the shadow. and they'll all be going in different directions. You probably need to cast a secondary shadow as well, since you have at least 2 light sources. The moon (which counts as local light because it is sunlight reflected off of the moon) and the fire.

    E: i would google images for you for tracers but... i HATE what they did to it. A photograph like this would have some motion blur on all counts because of the long exposure time required to gather enough light on the film. that's something else to consider.
    Last edited by SnaFuBAR; July 29th, 2010 at 10:24 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •