Page 4 of 39 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 14 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 383

Thread: Quick-Crit 2011

  1. #31
    A V A L O N TeeKup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    8,104

    Re: Quick-Crit 2011

    regular fire seems like it needs more "oomph" to it. The burst fire seems good though.

  2. #32
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,656

    Re: Quick-Crit 2011

    Yeah, pistol slides whip back so fast you almost don't even see it. Almost, though. You can see it, just not so clearly.

  3. #33
    Senior Member ICEE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: Quick-Crit 2011

    Actually I always slow down the cycling in my animations a little bit. I like it to be very visible

  4. #34
    got dam forumers.... SnaFuBAR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,159

    Re: Quick-Crit 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by Warsaw View Post
    Yeah, pistol slides whip back so fast you almost don't even see it. Almost, though. You can see it, just not so clearly.
    Also depends upon the pistol. 1911 actions are much slower than beretta 92's.

  5. #35
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,656

    Re: Quick-Crit 2011

    True. But it also depends on what manufacture of 1911 you are using. Some have lighter slides and/or heavier recoil springs. It's quite variable. I just feel like that animation was too slow even for a 1911.

  6. #36
    Splendid! ExAm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    8,558

    Re: Quick-Crit 2011

    Having fired a 1911 myself, the slide is still a lot faster than in that video. Pistols should recoil with a quick, jerk-snap motion in the hand, as well. By no means should it be a smooth motion. Recoil needs to be a visceral experience for the player, it makes shooting more fun. Bad company 2 is a great example of this.

  7. #37
    Senior Member ICEE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: Quick-Crit 2011

    Jesus christ guys. I told you I slow it down intentionally.

    And ExAm, there is so much more to the "experience" than animation. If you looked at bad company 2's pistol firing animation, the recoil is extremely light. Its the sound, camera wobbling, particles, and environmental effects that make the "experience". I cannot capture all of that with animation alone.

  8. #38
    Senior Member Patrickssj6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    'schland
    Posts
    3,838

    Re: Quick-Crit 2011

    I also don't understand why gaming companies don't add random movement to the shooting (moving the arm up / down / left /right)...or even better to every animation. Imagine a fighting game where all animations look unique

  9. #39
    Splendid! ExAm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    8,558

    Re: Quick-Crit 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by ICEE View Post
    Jesus christ guys. I told you I slow it down intentionally.

    And ExAm, there is so much more to the "experience" than animation. If you looked at bad company 2's pistol firing animation, the recoil is extremely light. Its the sound, camera wobbling, particles, and environmental effects that make the "experience". I cannot capture all of that with animation alone.
    Sure, but the slide pops back into place at the right speed. I'm not saying it should be heavy, it should just be quick.

  10. #40
    Senior Member ICEE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: Quick-Crit 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by Patrickssj6 View Post
    I also don't understand why gaming companies don't add random movement to the shooting (moving the arm up / down / left /right)...or even better to every animation. Imagine a fighting game where all animations look unique
    It might be interesting if done via overlay, but when firing in fully automatic you are essentially repeating one animation over and over in quick succession (usually), or in the case of your idea it would be multiple animations. Therefore it could come out with some jerky results if animation A following animation B is the "opposite" of its predecessor. If that makes any sense. Basically it could be done, possibly should be done, but it seems like most devs don't want to bother with making it seamless.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •