Low. Very low.Originally Posted by Amit
*coughdouchecough*
Last edited by MXC; November 7th, 2011 at 06:02 PM.
Well then I guess you wouldn't mind someone spawn strafing your jets and tanks then.
To be honest, it looks like most of BFM are aero-vehicle whores. Am I going to be the only one running ground ops when I get BF3 up and running?
Only if I do it :P
I'm too busy helping the rest of my team to risk missing my mark when parachuting into a 10-second killzone just to get some easy kills.
Naw dude, I love running on the ground more than anything.
Yeah. I much prefer to run around on the ground and shoot down the aircraftI'm getting quite good at it, too. I can fly a chopper decently, though.
I want an honest opinion from current Battlefield 3 players, here. Try and take a step back and really look at this objectively.
Does Battlefield 3 feel like a more fun, more polished, overall better experience online than Bad Company 2 was at the same point after release? How does it compare to the current iteration of Bad Company 2? How do the maps compare, how does the weapon handling compare, are the vehicles balanced properly, are there even enough vehicles of the right types? How is the squad system? The UI? The game modes? That kind of thing. I've been getting a lot of reports that BF3 is not a good successor to BF2, and that it is in fact even worse than Bad Company 2 on the whole. No factoring in Back to Karkand, or other updates we know about, because we don't know how they will turn out.
I've been in a jet precisely twice; both times I got shot down with Stingers before I could so much as spot a tank because you have to unlock flares first.
So yeah I'm sticking with topping the scoreboard as a medicbro
E:Oh man is it more polished than BC2; the in-game UI especially is surprisingly fluid and functional. I think it's definitely several steps up from BC2, although I do miss a few things from pre-BC Battlefields. The only two things thing I can really say that were better in BC2 were that vehicles didn't regenerate and there was more destruction; everything else - weapons, audio, visuals (duh), maps, vehicles, equipment - is equal at worst or a major improvement at best imo.
While I can appreciate those dumping on BF3 for being excessively simplified from BF2, I honestly don't understand those who are saying BC2 was better. But, of course, the only way for you to know for sure is to play it
EE: well, most of the maps; fuck Damavand on conquest and Metro on everything
Last edited by Ifafudafi; November 7th, 2011 at 11:10 PM.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks