Well, Ross? I'm not talking about range-queens either. I'm talking about aimed fire by a number of trained fighting men shooting at targets any distance away in a combat zone. That includes inside a house. A pistol grip is no more or less functional than a traditional grip for semi-automatic fire. Period.
I'm not trying to argue that traditional is better, I'm just saying that pistol grips aren't. Most military fighting men (in the US, look at the age range) today grew up with the AR-15 and thinking that modern guns are the coolest shit ever, and so they've not been exposed to much else. It's not about comfort, it's just about what they know. They are also die-hards and think just about any gun that ISN'T the AR-15 is inferior. And I know more than a few fighting men from many branches.
Also, I'd like to know what exactly you're referring to when you say traditional stocks can't do what you do with your AUG in the brush. I've done my share of crawling around in mud during airsoft games (yeah, can't compare to the real thing, but crawling is crawling), and I've done what amounts to the airsoft analogue of urban combat. About the only things I can come up with are one-handed shooting and blind fire.
I think you are forgetting that we've fought myriad wars with traditional stocks, and, for at least two of the major ones, pistol grips were available. It's not that one is that much better, it's just the times. Attaching a plastic grip onto a metal box is easier and cheaper than carving out an entire stock just for the grip.
E: And you may want to have that panic switch, but you don't get to use it. Why? Because collateral, that's why. Mantra of the age is "avoid collateral at all cost."
EE: Also, HUD option is nice, but never leave out the manual/mechanical option. I hate this move towards everything electronics. Stuff these days is not shielded adequately, so all it would take is one EMP and boom, all your shit is nigh useless.
Bookmarks