The nhancer thing that Pope posted did not help.![]()
I would think you would want vsync anyway to prevent image tearing at such a high resolution. The moment you run a game at 40fps+ you won't notice any lag unless it drops below 30fps. Having a fps in the 100's does not make a game better. Most people who claim to have 100fps+ usually fluctuate all the way back down to around 50fps at times no matter how good their rigs are. I would just prefer to be at a consistent 50-60fps if I won't even notice the difference. Your video hardware would probably run with less of a payload anyway if you kept it from running all those excessive amounts of frames too...
wtf does not having a great system have to do with being able to run vsync? (please tell me you know what vsync is) im saying if you had a computer that can reach much higher fps without vsync on... I also say vsync = quality because with vsync off, there is the possibility of tearing. vsync provides the most consistent visual experience. people who go for performance are trying to max their fps and often run on lower settings to achieve them. in todays day and age, anyone with a descent build can run halo on max settings with good enough fps (im talking in the mid hundreds) to the point where going any further in lowering their settings to get higher fps is pointless.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks