Page 373 of 577 FirstFirst ... 273 323 363 371 372 373 374 375 383 423 473 ... LastLast
Results 3,721 to 3,730 of 5765

Thread: Halo: Reach Discussion

  1. #3721
    Senior Member thehoodedsmack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,151

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Suggestion:

    Full-auto close-quarters weapons that do more damage the closer you are to an enemy. I'm not sure how the system works right now, but does an AR round from up-close do more damage than an AR round from a distance? If they'd do something like that, then people might stand a chance at shooting away at those double-melee players.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #3722
    Posts, posts EVERYWHERE! Warsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    State of Pandemonium
    Posts
    8,656

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    While they are at it, they might as well make the bullets have velocity and be affected by gravity.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3723
    halord Futzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    irc
    Posts
    1,447

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Warsaw View Post
    While they are at it, they might as well make the bullets have velocity and be affected by gravity.
    There weren't any hitscan weapons in halo 3 and it worked just fine.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #3724
    It Isn't Easy Being Green DarkHalo003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,152

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Warsaw View Post
    While they are at it, they might as well make the bullets have velocity and be affected by gravity.
    I don't think it matters so much due to the size of most maps. Only Forge World really has enough distance to where the bullet could be even seen to be affected by gravity. Any other map basically has too many obstacles to in the way, so bullets would mostly hit before gravity would even be effectively accounted. It'd just be a waste of engine in other words.

    I do agree a bit about distance and velocity needing to have effect on damage. However, are the common players that don't constantly ponder this type of addition really going to be satisfied. I think if an overwhelming majority agreed about it, then it'd be something to honestly consider, but the only weapons it'd honestly matter with would be precision weapons (not the Sniper Rifle) just because they're the only weapons that can be used moderately at long enough distances for the idea to be balanced.

    @thehoodedsmack:

    I think it's fine when it comes to the AR mainly because there are many other factors that come into play to balance it out. It's these kind of things that make me like Halo games just because it's totally unrealistic, but balanced enough to be fair to all players, not just some of those who complain about anything they think is wrong with the game. The AR works well against melee-users in Invasion mainly because the projectile error can hit Elites at point blank when the bloom has expanded out very far. I think if the Projectile Error was decreased just a bit to where each bullet didn't spray off into the distance when you fire the weapon (more or less like Halo3's projectile error), then double-melee in Team Slayer games would be not as easy.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #3725
    InnerGoat killed my dakimakura waifu because I didn't post my desk :( jcap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,193

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Warsaw View Post
    While they are at it, they might as well make the bullets have velocity and be affected by gravity.
    Actually, that's already the case with certain projectiles. See: rockets.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #3726
    Kid in the Hall Kornman00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    ◕‿◕, ┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    I think that's something to do with a projectile's fall off arc or w/e it's called and not actually or truly affected by the current world gravity. Something mythbusters should look into.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #3727
    halord Futzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    irc
    Posts
    1,447

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Kornman00 View Post
    I think that's something to do with a projectile's fall off arc or w/e it's called and not actually or truly affected by the current world gravity. Something mythbusters should look into.
    DMR, pistol, sniper, foces rifle, and AR are all hitscan. The rest behave in the same way they have since Halo 1 with projectile speeds and a defined arc.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #3728
    InnerGoat killed my dakimakura waifu because I didn't post my desk :( jcap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,193

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Hey Kornman, change the global for gravity in Reach and see if it affects it
    Reply With Quote

  9. #3729
    It Isn't Easy Being Green DarkHalo003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,152

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Can someone explain to me exactly what hitscan is? I've heard of it constantly and have not yet grasped the concept.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #3730
    Back for the Russian Halo p0lar_bear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    5,572

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Upon the trigger pull, a line is (invisibly, under the hood) drawn, originating from the point where bullets spawn (your FP camera for normal weapons, from the weapon itself on vehicles and HMGs). The line is pointed in a certain direction, based on the weapon's base inaccuracy or current reticle bloom. The line continues until either the maximum possible range of the weapon, or something collidable is hit, and damage is dealt and particle effects spawn on whatever it intersects with. (In the case of the sniper rifle, the line keeps going to its max range until a shielded target, or a wall is hit.)

    Most weapons that fire traditional bullets (or something like them) are hitscan in this game to relieve stress on the netcode; actual projectiles are more expensive than hitscan methods.
    Last edited by p0lar_bear; October 7th, 2010 at 09:37 PM.
    Reply With Quote

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •