Page 492 of 577 FirstFirst ... 392 442 482 490 491 492 493 494 502 542 ... LastLast
Results 4,911 to 4,920 of 5765

Thread: Halo: Reach Discussion

  1. #4911

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    It's a Halo TC mod that's been floating around for a while now, a combination of the "Helljumpers" mod and a port of the Halo 3 Elites as FO3 enemies. Both started at Fallout3Underground, I remember following them for a while after they started development.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #4912
    Senior Member NotZac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    127

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkHalo003 View Post
    Hur.
    edit: Snaked

    On a side note, I like Grifball. But my goodness if I get betrayed one more time I don't know what I'll do.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #4913
    It Isn't Easy Being Green DarkHalo003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,152

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Teltaur View Post
    It's a Halo TC mod that's been floating around for a while now, a combination of the "Helljumpers" mod and a port of the Halo 3 Elites as FO3 enemies. Both started at Fallout3Underground, I remember following them for a while after they started development.
    Ah okay, had a feeling there was a catch to it.
    Last edited by DarkHalo003; January 19th, 2011 at 09:11 PM.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4914
    Kid in the Hall Kornman00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    ◕‿◕, ┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by NotZac View Post
    if I get betrayed one more time I don't know what I'll do.
    Well you won't kick anyone that's for sure

    Isn't there a game option to disable friendly fire in MP? Why not add a third voting option or something with no OMGITZHAMMERTIEMMUSTKILLTEAMMATEZ settings
    Reply With Quote

  5. #4915

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Or better yet, why not just not have friendly fire to begin with? I really don't understand what's the point of making these random bullshit booting systems when you could just turn friendly fire off.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #4916
    State your identity! Hotrod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    5,282

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Kornman00 View Post
    Well you won't kick anyone that's for sure

    Isn't there a game option to disable friendly fire in MP? Why not add a third voting option or something with no OMGITZHAMMERTIEMMUSTKILLTEAMMATEZ settings
    The only time I've ever betrayed on purpose was when our ball carrier was being a total douche, and just sat at the back of our end of the court of the ball waiting to kill any enemy that comes near him without trying to score. I only killed him so I could take the ball then proceed to score a goal for us without much trouble since the enemy team wasn't very good.

    And that only happened once or maybe twice, I dunno.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #4917
    Kid in the Hall Kornman00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    ◕‿◕, ┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘
    Posts
    3,130

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Hotrod View Post
    The only time I've ever betrayed on purpose was when our ball carrier was being a total douche, and just sat at the back of our end of the court of the ball waiting to kill any enemy that comes near him without trying to score. I only killed him so I could take the ball then proceed to score a goal for us without much trouble since the enemy team wasn't very good.

    And that only happened once or maybe twice, I dunno.
    shadow and I had one of those people earlier today too


    Also, Bungie needs to bring arcade back so the fucking FF idlers can circle jerk themselves while those of us who actually want to play the fucking game can play together. I think the ban hammer is just a tall tale. In Ban Hammer we trust? Ban Hammer doesn't exist.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #4918
    It Isn't Easy Being Green DarkHalo003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,152

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Pretty interesting Weekly Challenge. If I'm doing nothing else Friday, I may complete in one day.
    Reply With Quote

  9. #4919
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    306

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    What happens when you try and tell Bnet kids that something is impossible?
    You get flamed, and told you don't know anything because you're not Bungie.

    And now, thanks to the user KillerSkippy21A, we have a quote from Evil Otto himself. xD (image proof too)
    Edited version, which is what everyone knows.
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Otto
    Not in a simple patch or update. Each map file in the game has all the content embedded in it. We would have to send out new map files of all the mulipler and singleplayer maps and require about 9 GB of HD storage. This is economically not feasible.
    Winsauce.
    Last edited by Shock120; January 25th, 2011 at 07:46 PM.
    Reply With Quote

  10. #4920
    For Gnomejas sevlag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,875

    Re: Halo: Reach Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Shock120 View Post
    What happens when you try and tell Bnet kids that something is impossible?
    You get flamed, and told you don't know anything because you're not Bungie.

    And now, thanks to the user KillerSkippy21A, we have a quote from Evil Otto himself. xD (image proof too)
    Edited version, which is what everyone knows.
    Winsauce.
    but just wait, your thread will still have "hurr its possible in X game" pop up one more time ATLEAST
    Reply With Quote

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •